Gandhi had young women in his ashram, some of them still teenagers, one of them his own grand-niece [Manu Gandhi], sleep naked with him in his bed at night.
La terapia espiritual de dormir con mujeres jóvenes desnudas para enfrentar a la lujuria le trajo graves problemas políticos a Gandhi.
Gandhi recibió muchas críticas por sus «experimentos sexuales», por parte de sus seguidores y oponentes. Su estenógrafo, R. P. Parasuram, renunció el primer día que sorprendió a Gandhi acostado desnudo con su sobrina nieta Manu. Gandhi insistió en que él no sentía ninguna excitación al acostarse con estas niñas Manu, Suhila o Abha. «Discúlpame, estás en libertad de abandonarme».
... se hizo de público conocimiento que Gandhi había estado compartiendo su cama durante unos cuantos años con niñas. Él explicó que lo hacía para probar su autocontrol como célibe, y para sentir calor en las noches de invierno. Rotulaba sus actividades como «una cura natural». En su carta a Ghanshyam Das Birla (en abril de 1945) se refiere a las «mujeres o niñas que han estado desnudas conmigo», indicando que habían sido varias las personas que formaron parte de sus experimentos. El sexo se convirtió en el tema más importante que hablaba Gandhi en sus largos monólogos, luego de la áhimsa (la no violencia), y aumentó en las últimas décadas de su vida. En Harijan dedicó cinco editoriales completas a explicar la práctica del celibato estricto (que él pretendía que practicaran todos sus seguidores). Como parte de esos experimentos, empezó durmiendo con todas sus discípulas (que no cobraban un sueldo por asistirlo, sino que vivían y trabajaban para él debido a sus convicciones), una por una, en la misma habitación, pero en colchonetas separadas por una distancia. Después empezó a dormir en la misma colchoneta. Y finalmente dormían ambos desnudos. De acuerdo con Gandhi, el celibato activo significaba el autocontrol perfecto incluso en presencia del sexo opuesto. Gandhi condujo sus experimentos con un gran número de jóvenes. Entre ellas estuvo Abha, la esposa de 16 años de su sobrino nieto Kanu Gandhi. Gandhi reconocía sin embargo que «este experimento es realmente muy peligroso», pero decía que «podía producir resultados muy grandes». Su sobrina nieta de 19 años de edad, Manu Gandhi, también fue parte de los expermientos sexuales. Gandhi le había escrito a su sobrino (el padre de Manu) Jaisukhlal Gandhi, que Manu había empezado a compartir su cama durante muchas noches porque él tenía que «corregirle la postura al dormir».
Las cartas al hijo son el último capítulo en las turbulentas historias que hay dentro de la familia de Mahatma Gandhi. Es de conocimiento público la afición del líder pacifista por dormir junto a jóvenes mujeres para, según explicaba, poner a prueba el celibato que había elegido a los 36 años, en ese autocontrol del deseo, incluía pasar noches con menores de edad calatas. En una carta de 1945, que recoge Jad Adams en el libro "Gandhi: Naked ambition", se refería a las "mujeres o niñas que han estado desnudas conmigo", algo que consiguió que la vida sexual del líder indio fuese siempre polémica.
Según Gandhi sus experimentos de dormir desnudo con su nieta Manu en Noakhali le ayudaba a contemplar la unidad entre hinduistas y musulmanes en la India antes de la partición, y liberaría las tensiones comunales. Gandhi les decía a las demás personas que él era como una madre para esas niñas, y se refería a Abha y Manu como «mis bastones».
Gandhi llamaba a Sarladevi (una devota seguidora, casada y con hijos) su «esposa espiritual». Más tarde diría que había llegado a casi tener relaciones sexuales con ella.21 En marzo de 1945 escribió una carta a un amigo acerca de que «[con SarlaDevi] empezamos a dormir juntos en la época en que tomé el voto de brahmacharia, o incluso antes». Dijo que había experimentado esto mismo con su esposa, «pero que no era suficiente». Gandhi se sintió satisfecho con sus experimentos y le escribió a Manu: «He practicado exitosamente los once votos que tomé. Esta es la culminación de mi lucha en los últimos 36 años. En este iagñá [‘sacrificio’, generalmente de fuego] he obtenido un vislumbre del ideal de pureza y verdad por el que he estado luchando».
Gandhi Used His Position To Sexually Exploit Young Women.
Oct 15, 2013 By Rita Banerji
NOTE: This letter is an excerpt from a collection of Gandhi’s letters which have been compiled into a book titled “Mahatma Gandhi’s Letters on Brahmacharya, Sexuality and Love” by Girja Kumar (Vitasta Publishing, 2011). More detailed citations and references on the chapter on Gandhi in Rita Banerji’s book “Sex and Power: Defining History, Shaping Societies,” [pages 265-281, Penguin Books, 2009].
It is a fact. Gandhi had young women in his ashram, some of them still teenagers, one of them his own grand-niece [Manu Gandhi], sleep naked with him in his bed at night. This was an aspect of Gandhi that I had not read about before, and it surprised me at first. I was researching for my book ‘Sex and Power’ which looks at the history of sex and sexuality in India, and it was important for me to investigate this further.
My initial tendency was to regard this as “gossip,” but then some of the biographies confirmed it as fact, but also hurriedly dismissed it as something that we all apparently should accept as the eccentricities of “great” men! That’s not a logical argument for me and so I began to dig into archives for more information till a complete picture emerged. And that picture upset me. I saw Gandhi as a classic example of a sexual predator — a man who uses his position of power to manipulate and sexually exploit the people he directly controls.
Most angering for me was reading about the psychological and emotional trauma of the girls and women who he used for his “experiments,” which is what he called these incidents. The word ‘psychotic’ repeatedly came up in various documents with regards to these women’s mental state. The women, most of who were in their late teens or early twenties [not surprisingly, given he could have ‘experimented’ with the older women or even his own wife!] were repeatedly described as depressed and weeping, and seemed to be completely in his control. Besides this, some of the archival references lead me to believe that Gandhi may well have been practicing the traditional, historic form of Indian celibacy which hinges on one thing only — and that is control of ejaculation. Everything else is permitted.
What I could not understand is why school texts and biographies have selectively edited out this information because it was a big and explosive aspect of the inner dynamics of the Gandhi ashram and its inmates for the last 10 years of Gandhi’s life. It eventually led to the partial break-up of his inner-core circle.
But Gandhi is long dead. So why should the naked girls in Gandhi’s bed matter today?
Well, because the issue goes way beyond Gandhi. What really matters now, and it matters deeply, is how we respond to what Gandhi did!
Today we like to believe that we are far more progressive in terms of recognizing and condemning the abuse of power by men for sexual exploitation and abuse. And yet, I repeatedly find every time I bring this up [for eg. in this article Gandhi to Asharam: Who Empowers the Sex-Crimes of Gurus?] most people’s responses are defensive and regressive!
But this is what surprised me most! Compared to our reactions and responses today, the people in Gandhi’s time seemed to be far more progressive! They not only recognized that he was abusing his position and power in a way that was unethical and depraved, but they outright condemned it, confronted it, and eventually forced him to stop!
On 16th March, 1947, Nirmal Kumar Bose, one of Gandhi’s closest associates wrote a letter to Kishorlal G. Mashruwala, another of Gandhi’s close colleagues, saying, “When I first learnt about Gandhi’s experiment in which a girl took off her clothes and lay under the same cover with him and he tried to find out if any sexual feeling was evoked in him or his companion, I felt genuinely surprised. Personally, I would not tempt myself like that and more than that, my respect for [women] would prevent me from treating her as an instrument in my experiment…”
N.K. Bose’s letter was only one of the many exchanges among Gandhi’s closest associates and friends in the first half of 1947, about this practice of his that angered and upset many. These included prominent leaders of India’s freedom movement such as Vallabhai Patel, J. B. Kriplani and Vinobha Bhave. Many of them confronted Gandhi directly, and others stopped associating with him.
This 1947 storm in the Gandhi camp was set off by R. P. Parasuram, a young man from Kerala who for two years had served as Gandhi’s personal secretary and typist and watched his personal affairs from close by. Like many students in India at that time, Parasuram too had idolized Gandhi and after his studies, had travelled to Gandhi’s ashram to live and work with him, and help with India’s freedom movement.
But two years after working with Gandhi, Parasuram quit the ashram and his job. Before he left he wrote a 16-pg long letter explaining his distress at what he had witnessed in Gandhi’s behaviour with girls and women in the ashram — which included other things besides his ‘experiments’ in bed. He said that as much as he had worshipped Gandhi, his conscience did not allow him to stay silent any longer. And that in order for him to continue, Gandhi had to concede to 5 of his demands [all of which dealt with Gandhi’s physical interactions with girls at the ashram] which he listed in the letter. [See the letter below.]
On 2 January 1947 Gandhi responded to Parasuram’s letter with, “I cannot concede your demands…Since such is my opinion and there is a conflict of ideals…you are at liberty to leave me today.”
Parasuram did leave as did some of Gandhi’s other close associates. But others, especially those who were in more senior positions as friends and associates, continued their pressure on Gandhi to stop.
One of the things that were a big issue was Gandhi’s hypocrisy and manipulation, to what seemed to many to serve his own ends. Gandhi had made an unwritten rule of celibacy for all the inhabitants of his ashram. Oddly, he would even make married couples take this vow because he believed this was central to his philosophy of non-violence. Sexual stimulation of any sort, he preached, evoked violence in one’s thoughts and behaviour. He would tell them that even touching each other was unacceptable. He made the life of one of his own son’s whose wife got pregnant, absolutely hell, angry that they had had sex when he had forbidden them to! Yet he was free to do as he pleased! He was so confident that he wouldn’t be challenged!
Swami Anand and Kedarnath in a question and answer grilling from 15-16 March 1947 shot off questions like “Why did you not take your coworkers into confidence and carry them with you [into] this novel practice?” and “Why do we find so much disquiet and unhappiness around you? Why are your companions emotionally unhinged?”
The Congress President J. B. Kriplani told him that he was simply, “exploiting human beings as means rather than as ends in themselves.”
N.K. Bose suggested this course of action for Gandhi: “… he should not allow Manu [Gandhi’s great-niece] to sleep in the same bed with him until he had tried enough to educate the public into his new way of thinking, or the public had got all the fact about him and clearly expressed its disapproval. Then he [can go]…back to his practice with the full brunt of his suffering for the opinion which he held right.”
Vallabhai Patel told Gandhi off to his face. He said what he was doing was adharma (immoral). In a classic, egotistical way Gandhi retorted to Patel by telling Balkrishna Bhave “for me Manu sleeping with me is a matter of dharma (moral duty).”
But under this onslaught Gandhi eventually conceded defeat, even if not willingly. He said he felt like a “broken reed.” His ego and narcissism had been broken by people around him who fortunately understood and did better than we do today!
This is the question that I’d like to ask everyone reading this. Why is it that hard to say, yes Gandhi, the hero of India’s freedom movement had also used his power and position to sexually exploit/abuse girls and women who came under the mantle of his leadership?