Quantcast

GUERRAS DEL PETROLEO

Tuesday 11 september 2012 2 11 /09 /Set /2012 18:15

 

 

Plan to Attack Iran

Plan to Attack Iran

 

Informe: EE.UU. presenta a Israel plan de ataque con Irán 


JERUSALEN - Un periódico israelí informó el domingo que un funcionario de alta seguridad de la administración Obama ha comunicado a Israel los planes estadounidenses para un posible ataque contra Irán, con el propósito de reasegurarles que Washington está dispuesto a actuar militarmente, si la diplomacia y las sanciones para presionar a Teherán de que abandone su programa nuclear de enriquecimiento de uranio, fallan.

.

Un alto funcionario israelí, que habló bajo condición de anonimato sobre las conversaciones confidenciales de gobierno a gobierno, dijo que el artículo en el diario Haaretz era incorrecto.

El diario Haaretz dijo que el asesor de Seguridad Nacional Tom Donilon expuso los planes ante el primer ministro israelí, Benjamin Netanyahu, durante una cena en una visita a Israel a principios de este mes. Citó a un alto funcionario estadounidense no identificado como la fuente de su informe, en el contexto de que el presunto candidato presidencial republicano Mitt Romney estaría diciendo a Israel que apoyaría un ataque militar israelí contra Irán.

.

El funcionario estadounidense también dijo que Donilon compartió información sobre las armas de Estados Unidos que podrían ser utilizadas para este tipo de ataque, y de la capacidad militar de EE.UU. para llegar a las instalaciones nucleares iraníes bajo tierra, dijo el diario. Citó otro funcionario de EE.UU. involucrado en las conversaciones con Israel como la conclusión de que "el tiempo para una operación militar contra Irán no ha llegado todavía".

.

El funcionario israelí, que habló bajo condición de anonimato para discutir una presunta reunión confidencial, dijo: "No hay nada correcto en el artículo. Donilon no se reunió com el primer ministro de Israel para cenar, no hubo encuentro uno-a-uno, ni tampoco presentó los planes operativos para atacar a Irán.


La Embajada de EE.UU. no tenía comentarios inmediatos. Haaretz citó a Tommy Vietor, portavoz del Consejo Nacional de Seguridad de los EE.UU. y se negó a comentar la conversación confidencial entre Netanyahu y Donilon.

.

Tanto Israel como EE.UU. piensan que el objetivo final de Irán es desarrollar la tecnología de armas nucleares y no sólo producir energía e isótopos médicos como afirma Teherán. Funcionarios estadounidenses temen que Israel podría atacar las instalaciones nucleares iraníes antes de tiempo, y han estado tratando de convencer a los dirigentes israelíes de que pueden depender de Washington para impedir que Irán se convierta en una potencia nuclear.

Los líderes israelíes han dicho repetidamente que no contratarían la seguridad de su país a otra nación.

En Jerusalén el domingo, un alto asesor de política exterior de Romney dijo a los periodistas: "Si Israel tiene que tomar medidas por su cuenta, con el fin de impedir que Irán desarrolle la capacidad (para construir un arma nuclear), el gobernador respetaría esa decisión". Romney también considera que la posibilidad de un ataque de EE.UU. también debe considerarse.


.

 


.

 Report: U.S. presents Israel with Iran strike plan


29/7/2012 - JERUSALEM — An Israeli newspaper reported Sunday that the Obama administration’s top security official has briefed Israel on U.S. plans for a possible attack on Iran, seeking to reassure it that Washington is prepared to act militarily should diplomacy and sanctions fail to pressure Tehran to abandon its nuclear enrichment program.

A senior Israeli official, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss confidential talks, said the article in the Haaretz daily was incorrect.

Haaretz said National Security Adviser Tom Donilon laid out the plans before Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during a dinner at a visit to Israel earlier this month. It cited an unidentified senior American official as the source of its report, which came out as presumptive Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney was telling Israel he would back an Israeli military strike against Iran.

The American official also said Donilon shared information on U.S. weapons that could be used for such an attack, and on the U.S. military’s ability to reach Iranian nuclear facilities buried deep underground, the newspaper said. It cited another U.S. official involved in the talks with Israel as concluding that “the time for a military operation against Iran has not yet come.”

The Israeli official, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss a confidential meeting, said, “Nothing in the article is correct. Donilon did not meet the prime minister for dinner, he did not meet him one-on-one, nor did he present operational plans to attack Iran.” He had no information when asked if Donilon had discussed any kind of attack plans with any Israeli official. Haaretz said another Israeli official attended for part of the meeting.

The U.S. Embassy had no immediate comment. Haaretz cited Tommy Vietor, a spokesman for the U.S. National Security Council, as declining to comment on the confidential discussion between Netanyahu and Donilon.

Both Israel and the U.S. think Iran’s ultimate aim is to develop weapons technology, and not just produce energy and medical isotopes as Tehran claims. U.S. officials are concerned that Israel might attack Iranian nuclear facilities prematurely, and have been trying to convince Israeli leaders they can depend on Washington to keep Iran from becoming a nuclear power.

Israeli leaders have repeatedly said they would not contract out their country’s security to another nation.

In Jerusalem on Sunday, a top Romney foreign policy adviser told reporters, “If Israel has to take action on its own, in order to stop Iran from developing the capability (to build a nuclear weapon), the governor would respect that decision.” Romney also thinks the option of a U.S. attack should also be on the table.


 

 

Report: U.S. presents Israel with Iran strike plan - Washington Times
www.washingtontimes.com/.../report-us-presents... - Traducir esta página
29 Jul 2012 – Report: U.S. presents Israel with Iran strike plan ... Both Israel and theU.S. think Iran's ultimate aim is to develop weapons technology, and not ...
  1. US admits it has military plan to attack Iran - Telegraph
    www.telegraph.co.uk › ... › Middle East › Iran - Traducir esta página 17 May 2012 – The United States has acknowledged the existence of a fully-fledged military plan to attack Iran, significantly increasing tensions with Tehran ...
  2. Israeli media reports on US plans to attack Iran nukes - NYPOST.com
    www.nypost.com/.../peek_at_bam_iran_bomb_p... - Traducir esta página 5 Aug 2012 – An American attack on Iran's nukes would begin with “hundreds of cruise missiles” meant to demolish Iranian air defenses, intelligence facilities ...
  3. US strike plan on Iran 'ready' - BBC
    www.bbc.co.uk/.../world-middle-east-18110191 - Traducir esta página 17 May 2012 – The US has plans in place to attack Iran if other measures fail to stop it developing nuclear weapons, Washington's envoy to Israel says.

 

Cagle Cartoons - Published on Sep 11, 2012 

 

Facts Indicate.S. And Israel More Likely To Attack Iran than The Other Way Around

 

 

Just looking at the facts, it appears far more likely that theU.S. will attack Iran again than Iran would attack the U.S. orIsraelAmerica's Middle Eastpawn. I say "again" because the U.S. has already an embarrassing record of aggression against Iran, so, if past is prologue, the U.S./Israelialliance will strike Iran, not the other way around. A review of the historical record and contemporary military outlays and actions tends to support this view. In 1953, the CIA overthrew the democratically elected government of Iranian Premier Mohammad Mossedagh, a crime for which the U.S. has never apologized. The overthrow put Mohammad-Reza Shah(king) Palevi on the throne, a man whose dictatorship savagely tortured and killed thousands of Iranians for 26 years.

 

An Iranian woman walks past an anti-US mural, painted on the wall of the former US Embassy in Tehran, Iran, at the side lines of an annual state-backed rally, on Friday, Nov. 4, 2011, marking the anniversary of the seizure of the US Embassy by militant students on Nov. 4, 1979.

 

 

As all this occurred long before Iran had the beginning of any nuclear activity so in no way could the U.S. make the claim it makes today that Iran's nuclear program then represented some kind of existential threat to U.S. ally Israel that justified an attack. Instead, the evidence overwhelmingly supports the view the CIA intervention came about because Iran kicked out the Anglo-Iranian oil company (known today as BP) when the British firm swindled the Iranians out of their fair share of revenues from the oil fields. The Shah's savagery led to angry Iranians toppling his regime and storming the U.S. Embassy in 1979, holding its 54-member staff prisoner for 444 days and embarrassing the U.S. before the world.

 

The next U.S. attack on Iran came via America's then Middle East goodbuddy Saddam Hussein, the Iraqi dictator. He got poisonous chemicals, anthrax and bubonic plague germs from the U.S. to use against the Iranians! Hussein had started the war to grab Iranian oil and was at the point of losing the struggle when the U.S. intervened. Tens of thousands of Iranian troops and civilians were struck and killed by U.S.-supplied poison gas. The U.S. also supplied Hussein with military equipment and valuable intelligence.

 

On July 3, 1988, toward the end of that war, scheduled Iran Air Flight 655 was blown up in mid-air over Iranian territorial waters (the Strait of Hormuz) en route to Dubai, in the United Arab Emirates by the guided missile cruiser USS Vincennes. All of the airliners' 290 civilian passengers and crew were killed. The U.S. agreed to pay Iran reparations for those slain but, again, the U.S. never apologized, once more betraying its hostile intent.

 

More recently U.S. and/or Israeli clandestine attacks have taken place against Iran, including the dispatch of spies into that country as reported by investigative reporter Seymour Hersh. What's more, Iranian nuclear scientists have been assassinated; Iran has also been assaulted by computer virus; and oil pipelines have been blown up. Most recently, Hersh wrote in "The New Yorker," Iranian dissident terrorists have been trained in America and sent back into that country with enhanced capability to create mayhem. If these acts do not bare hostile intent, there was the downing a few months ago of a U.S. drone spy plane in Iran air space.

 

Finally, there has been the U.S.-led campaign of sanctions against Iran, said already to have cost that country $60 billion in lost revenue from plunging oil sales. All these high-pressure tactics allegedly have been taken because Iran has got a nuclear military program----a charge top U.S. defense and intelligence chiefs uniformly state is unsubstantiated. Their view is supported by two past directors of the UN's International Atomic Energy Agency.

 

If the foregoing list of aggressive moves is not enough to reveal the hostile intent of the U.S., there is the threat of a massive assault against Iran from some 40 U.S. military sites that just happen to ring Iran, part of the system of 1,100 U.S. foreign bases from which the Pentagon militarily dominates the planet. Bases from which the U.S. menaces Iran are located in TurkmenistanKyrgystanPakistanSaudi ArabiaOman, Israel and Turkey, among others. The Turkish base at Incirlik, for example, has U.S. tactical nukes in its arsenal.

 

Aggressor nations may often be identified by the nature and number of their armaments, their preparation for war, and the disposition of their troops. Hitler, for instance, massed 2-million troops along the Soviet frontier prior to his June, 1941, attack, and Japan struck China with a force of about 1.7 million. Soviet Russia, which attacked Finland in 1939, between 1936 and 1940 boosted military outlays by 400%; Germany, between 1933 and 1940, hiked military spending from 2% of national income to 44%. In moves echoing the spending barrage of the above-cited dictatorships, the U.S. between 2001and 2011 boosted Pentagon spending by 81%, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute(SIPRI).

 

While Iran's "nuclear threat" is made out by U.S. media to appear to menace the world, in reality Iran has no nuclear bomb stockpile while Israel is estimated to have between 150 and 300 nuclear weapons and the U.S. is said to have 20,000. As far as overall military spending goes, Iran ranks 25th among all nations, spending $7 billion a year, just one percent of the extraordinary $711 billion Americans lavish on the Pentagon. This outlay makes America the foremost military spender of all time, a nation whose arms budget is the equal roughly of all the nations of the world combined. As for Israel, it ranks 18th, and SIPRI lists its military budget in 2011 as $13 billion, nearly twice that of Iran.

 

Finally, it behooves us to look at the pattern of aggressive military actions of the past 50 years by the parties being reviewed. Israel has begun several wars against its neighbors while the U.S. has attackedViet NamPanamaNicaraguaAfghanistanIraqLibyaYemenSomalia, and others. Additionally, the CIA is said to have overthrown more than two dozen governments. In the same period, the number of countries attacked by Iran is zero.

 

Question: if your country was ringed by 40 military bases on which the world's most powerful and most aggressive war-maker had parked nuclear weapons, and whose military spending overmatched your own by 700 to one, wouldn't you have to be crazy to launch a war of aggression against it or its Israeli ally? The charge that Iran represents an "existential threat" to Israel appears to be a gross twisting of the historic record and relevant military evidence. #

 

(Sherwood Ross formerly wrote for major dailies and wire services and today is a Miami-based public relations consultant who also writes on military and political topics. Reach him at sherwoodross10@gmail.com. See his public relations website at Sherwood Ross Associates.)

 

        http://article.wn.com/view/2012/04/23/US_And_Israel_More_Likely_To_Attack_Iran_than_The_Other_Way_/

 

Never Forget 9 11

.

Por cinabrio - Publicado en: GUERRAS DEL PETROLEO
Escribir un comentario - Ver los 0 comentarios
Thursday 16 august 2012 4 16 /08 /Ago /2012 16:13


Japan Coast Guard released a photo of the Hong Kong fishing boat The boat sailed from Hong Kong with a group of chinese activists on board

 


Japan arrests pro-China activist swimmers in island row

.

Las islas en el archipiélago de las Senkaku son disputadas por ambos países

El primer ministro nipón, Yoshihiko Noda, indicó tras los arrestos que Tokio actuará con los detenidos severamente y de acuerdo a la ley japonesa

 

Map

 

.

 

.

Manifestantes sostienen  pancartas contra Japón fuera del Consulado General de Japón en Hong Kong el miércoles, 15 de agosto 2012

 

 

Japón arresta a 14 activistas chinos por desembarcar en islas disputadas

 

El primer ministro nipón, Yoshihiko Noda, indicó tras los arrestos que Tokio actuará con los detenidos severamente. 

 

 

TOKIO, JAPÓN (15/AGO/2012).- Las autoridades de Japón han detenido a 14 activistas chinos que desembarcaron en el disputado archipiélago de las Senkaku, en el Mar de China Oriental, para reclamar su soberanía, informó la agencia local Kyodo. 

 

El primer ministro nipón, Yoshihiko Noda, indicó tras los arrestos que Tokio actuará con los detenidos "severamente" y "de acuerdo a la ley" japonesa. 

 

El desembarco de los activistas, detenidos por violar la ley de inmigración nipona, provocó además que el Gobierno japonés convocara en el Ministerio de Asuntos Exteriores al embajador chino en Tokio, al que transmitió una protesta formal. 

 

Los activistas partieron del puerto de Hong Kong el pasado domingo en un pesquero que entró hoy en aguas japonesas poco antes de las 16:00 horas (07:00 GMT) pese a las advertencias en contra de los guardacostas nipones, detalló Kyodo. 

 

Un primer grupo de arrestados, formado por cinco personas, tomó tierra en una de las islas del archipiélago, la de Uotsuri, lo que llevó a su detención por parte de la policía nipona. 

 

Las autoridades japonesas arrestaron horas después a otras nueve personas, entre ellas un periodista de televisión, que también desembarcaron en los islotes. 

 

La policía nipona explicó que transferirá de momento a los detenidos a un puerto en la provincia de Okinawa, la región japonesa que administra estos islotes. 

 

Antes de conocerse el arresto, el portavoz del Gobierno japonés, Osamu Fujimura, había indicado que el Ejecutivo vigilaba de cerca los movimientos del barco y abordaría la cuestión con autoridades de China y Hong Kong por la vía diplomática. 

 

Según Kyodo, uno de estos activistas había indicado al Comité de Acción para la Defensa de las Islas Diaoyu (como se conoce al archipiélago en China), con sede en Hong Kong, que el pesquero era seguido por nueve patrulleros de la Guardia Costera nipona. 

 

La misma fuente señaló que uno de los barcos japoneses había disparado cañones de agua contra el pesquero, mientras otra patrullera se había aproximado con la aparente intención de abordarlo. 

 

La protesta coincidió con el 67 aniversario de la rendición de Japón en la II Guerra Mundial, que marcó el fin de la contienda y también de la ocupación colonial nipona en la región. 

 

El diminuto archipiélago de las Senkaku, que está deshabitado, es reclamado por Japón, China y Taiwán (que lo conoce como islas Tiaoyutai), ya que se cree que cuenta con ricos recursos marinos y yacimientos de gas y petróleo. 

 

El conflicto territorial en torno a estas islas ha sido un constante foco de tensión en las relaciones entre Japón y China, que en 2010 atravesaron una seria crisis a raíz de la detención del capitán de un pesquero chino que faenaba en esa zona.

http://www.informador.com.mx/internacional/2012/397796/6/japon-arresta-a-14-activistas-chinos-por-desembarcar-en-islas-disputadas.htm

.

.

 

 28 de mayo 2012 - Qu Lin, de 45 años, pesca en Qingdao, China. Los recursos pesqueros marinos están desapareciendo  en China debido a la pesca excesiva y la contaminación de los océanos. Muchos pescadores chinos tienen que renunciar a sus caladeros tradicionales de subsistencia. Algunos de ellos tienen que navegar hasta la frontera marítima en disputa o cruzar la frontera, causando conflictos con países vecinos como las dos Coreas, Japón, Vietnam y Filipinas.

 

May 28, 2012 - Qu Lin, 45, fishes in Qingdao, China. Marine fishery resources in China are disappearing because of excessive fishing and ocean pollution. Many Chinese fishermen have to give up their patrimonial livelihoods. Some of them have to sail to the disputed sea border or cross the boundary, causing disputes with neighboring countries such as South Korea, North Korea, Japan, Vietnam and the Philippines.

 

 

 

 

Japan-China disputed islands

One of the islands in the Senkaku/Diaoyu chain (file image)
  • The archipelago consists of five islands and three reefs
  • Japan, China and Taiwan claim them; they are controlled by Japan and form part of Okinawa prefecture
  • Japanese businessman Kunioki Kurihara owns three of the islands, which he rents out to the Japanese state
  • The islands were the focus of a major diplomatic row between Japan and China in 2010
  • .

Japan-S Korea disputed islands

A South Korean coastguard vessel passes the Dokdo/Takeshima islands (file image)
  • Known as Dokdo (Solitary islands) in Korea, Takeshima (Bamboo islands) in Japan
  • Also known as Liancourt rocks
  • Claimed by Japan and South Korea, but occupied by South Korea since 1954
  • Just 230,000 sq m in size, with no fresh water
  • But surrounding waters valuable for their fishing

 

.

 

.

 11 de mayo 2012 - Protesta de  filipinos frente al consulado chino en Los Ángeles, parte de la protesta mundial debida a una creciente disputa territorial en el Mar de China Meridional. La cuestión se centra en Scarborough Shoal, un pequeño afloramiento rocoso a unas 140 millas de la isla filipina de Luzón. Filipinas dice que es parte de su territorio, ya que cae dentro de su zona económica exclusiva. China, sin embargo, reclama prácticamente todo el Mar de China Meridional, que se cree se ubica encima de enormes reservas de petróleo y gas, alegando que es su territorio histórico, incluso aguas cercanas a las costas de otros países asiáticos. Los editoriales de los periódicos controlados por el gobernante Partido Comunista han advertido repetidamente de que China está dispuesta a ir a la guerra contra las Filipinas para poner fin a la disputa.

 

May 11, 2012 - Filipinos protest in front of the Chinese Consulate in Los Angeles as part of a global protest over an escalating territorial row in the South China Sea. The issue centers on Scarborough Shoal, a tiny rocky outcrop about 140 miles from the Philippines’ main island of Luzon. The Philippines says is part of its territory because it falls within its exclusive economic zone. China, however, claims virtually all of the South China Sea, which is believed to sit atop huge oil and gas reserves, as its historical territory, even waters close to the coasts of other Asian countries. Editorials in newspapers controlled by the ruling Communist Party have repeatedly warned that China is prepared to go to war against the Philippines to end the standoff.

 

 

 

Pescadores filipinos navegar entre las Fuerzas Filipinas y Marines de EE.UU. que realizan ejercicios militares conjuntos en la bahía de Ulugan, frente al Mar de China Meridional, en Puerto Princesa, en la isla de Palawan, al sur de Manila. Filipinas dijo que los "juegos de guerra" con los Estados Unidos, que acabaron el 27 de abril, habían mostrado su voluntad de defenderse de las agresiones externas en medio de una creciente disputa territorial con China

 

 Philippine fishermen sail past Philippine forces and U.S. Marines conducting joint military exercises along Ulugan Bay, facing the South China Sea, in Puerto Princesa, on Palawan island, south of Manila. The Philippines said war games with the United States, which ended April 27, had showcased its resolve to fend off external aggressors amid an escalating territorial dispute with China

.

.

11/3/2012 -  Filipino protesters stage an anti-China rally outside the Chinese Embassy in Makati City in Manila

 

 

 

10 de mayo 2012 - filipinos a bordo de sus botes de madera a motor en las islas periféricas frente el Mar Meridional de China arriban al mercado de Masinloc, en la provincia Zambales, al norte de Manila, para comprar alimentos. Masinloc está a unos 140 kilómetros del banco marino Scarborough Shoal. Los pescadores de este poblado costero de Filipinas han estado haciendo el viaje al banco marino durante dos décadas, un viaje que puede durar de 8 a 14 horas dependiendo de las condiciones de navegación.

.

 

 

May 10, 2012 - Residents aboard their motorized wooden boats and living in outlying islands facing the South China Sea arrive at the market of Masinloc, in Zambales province, north of Manila, to buy food supplies. Masinloc is about 140 miles from Scarborough Shoal. Fishermen from this Philippine coastal town have been making the journey to the shoal for two decades, a trip that can take eight to 14 hours depending on sailing conditions.

 

.

.

 

May 21, 2012 - The departure of China National Offshore Oil Corp.'s first independent deep-water oil drilling rig, from the port of Qingdao, in east China's Shandong province. China's first homegrown deep-water drilling rig will be located in the South China Sea, about 200 miles southeast of Hong Kong. China, which needs oil imports to fuel its surging economy, claims full sovereignty on the sea, which has huge oil and gas reserves, often leading to diplomatic rows with its neighbors.

 

21 de mayo 2012 - Partida de la primera plataforma de perforación petrolera de aguas profundas de la China National Offshore Oil Corp. 's , desde el puerto de Qingdao, en Shandong. La primera  plataforma de perforación petrolera de aguas profundas  construída en Chinaco explorará el Mar Meridional de China, a unos 200 kilómetros al sureste de Hong Kong. China, que necesita las importaciones de petróleo para alimentar su economía creciente, reclama plena soberanía sobre el mar, que tendría enormes reservas de petróleo y gas, lo que a menudo conduce a roces diplomáticos con sus vecinos.

 

.

 

June 1, 2012 . Philippines banana grower Renante Flores shows off the fruit he can no longer sell to China. He is a victim of sudden Chinese restrictions on banana imports from the Philippines that China says have been imposed for health reasons but which growers believe are retaliation for the dispute around Scarborough Shoal.

 

01 de junio 2012 -  Renante Flores productor de banano filipino muestra la fruta que ya no pueden vender a China. Él es una víctima de repentinas restricciones chinas a las importaciones de banano de Filipinas que China dice haber impuesto por razones sanitarias. Los productores creen que son una represalia por la disputa en torno al banco marino Scarborough Shoal.

 

.

.

.

April 24, 2012 - The guided missile destroyer USS Chafee, right, is seen anchored off Tien Sa port in the central Vietnamese city of Da Nang. U.S. sailors from three ships of the Seventh Fleet held a five-day "non-combatant" exchange of activities with Vietnamese sailors in the port city amid rising tensions in the South China Sea with China.

 

24 de abril 2012 - El destructor de misiles guiados USS Chafee, a la derecha, se ve anclado en el puerto Tien Sa, en la ciudad central vietnamita de Da Nang. Marineros de Estados Unidos de tres barcos de la Séptima Flota realizaron por cinco días intercambio de actividades  "no combatientes" con los marineros vietnamitas en la ciudad portuaria en medio de crecientes tensiones en el Mar Meridional de China con la Republica Popular China.

 

 

 

 

 

Japan arrests pro-China activist swimmers in island row

.

Japanese police have arrested 14 pro-China activists who landed on disputed islands, reports say.

 

15 August 2012 - The group had sailed from Hong Kong to the islands, known as Senkaku in Japan and Diaoyu in China, followed by Japanese coastguard vessels.

 

China called for the activists' immediate and unconditional release.

 

Japan is also embroiled in a dispute with South Korea about another island group, as well as a high-level visit to the controversial Yasukuni shrine.

 

The various rows erupted as Japan marked the anniversary of its surrender at the end of World War II and South Korea its independence from Japanese colonial rule.

 

The group of pro-China activists set sail on Sunday.

 

Japanese coastguard vessels surrounded the boat as it approached, but seven of the activists jumped overboard and swam to one of the islands, local media report.

Officials told the BBC that two activists returned to the boat, while the other five were arrested on land.

 

Later, the coastguard said the two activists who returned and seven more who had remained on the boat had been arrested for "alleged illegal entry".

 

It is the first time non-Japanese nationals have landed on the disputed islands since 2004.

 

A spokesman for the group said they wanted the world to know "that this is - way back in history - the territory of China".

 

"The Japanese have no right to stop us," David Ko told the Associated Press from Hong Kong.

 

Chief Cabinet Secretary Osamu Fujimura said Japan had lodged a diplomatic protest with China and in Hong Kong over the activists.

 

A foreign ministry spokesman had earlier warned Japan not to "endanger" the activists and said Beijing was ''paying close attention'' to the developments, Xinhua said.

 

Shrine visit

Tensions between China and Japan have been rumbling in recent months over the islands in the East China Sea.

 

Taiwan also claims the Senkaku or Diaoyu islands, which are controlled by Japan and form part of Okinawa prefecture.

 

 

 Largely uninhabited, they are close to strategically important shipping lanes, offer rich fishing grounds and are thought to contain oil deposits.

 

In September 2010, relations between China and Japan plummeted after the arrest of a Chinese trawler captain near the islands. The captain was accused of ramming two Japanese patrol vessels in the area, but Japan eventually dropped the charges against him.

 

In April a fresh row ensued after Tokyo Governor Shintaro Ishihara said he would use public money to buy the islands from the current private owner.

 

Meanwhile, a group of South Koreans finished a relay swim early on Wednesday to another group of islands claimed by Japan.

 

It followed the first-ever visit of a South Korean president to the islands - called Dokdo by South Korea and Takeshima in Japan - on Friday.

 

President Lee Myung-bak's visit has infuriated Japan, which recalled its ambassador to South Korea. Mr Lee, meanwhile, on Wednesday hit out at Japan for failing to heal historical wounds.

 

And in Japan, ministers Jin Matsubara and Yuichiro Hata paid what they said were private visits to the Yasukuni Shrine to mark the end of WW II, despite Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda urging members of his cabinet not to do so.

 

The shrine is dedicated to Japan's war dead, including war criminals, and is viewed by many of the country's neighbours as a reminder of Japan's military past.

 

Both China and South Korea have protested against the visit

.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-china-19264633

 

.

April 25, 2012 - U.S. and Filipino troops take part in a joint mock beachfront assault on the shore of Ulugan Bay on Palawan island. The soldiers stormed the South China Sea island in war games that took place not far from a real-life maritime standoff between Manila and Beijing.

 

Por cinabrio - Publicado en: GUERRAS DEL PETROLEO
Escribir un comentario - Ver los 0 comentarios
Thursday 2 august 2012 4 02 /08 /Ago /2012 16:21

Fossil Fuel Supply Shortages Behind India's Largest Power Blackout Ever

 

 

http://www.treehugger.com/energy-disasters/fossil-fuel-supply-shortages-behind-india-largest-power-blackout-ever.html

.

La escasez de combustible fósil está detrás del masivo apagón de la India

 

Tras el apagón más grande de la historia en la red eléctrica en el norte de la India, y la completa restauración del suministro eléctrico alrededor de 15 horas más tarde, la nación volvió a ser golpeada por un colosal corte de energía, del doble del tamaño del que acababa de pasar. Dos apagones seguiditos. Huffington Post informa que tres redes de energía regionales, que cubre 20 de los 28 estados, han colapsado dejando a 620 millones de personas sin electricidad. Esto, por supuesto, se suma a los cientos de millones de indios pobres que no tienen acceso a la electricidad jamás en sus vidas.

.

Es el mayor fallo en una red eléctrica en el mundo.

.

Cuatro horas después del inicio del apagón, la energía fue restaurada en el 45% de la red noreste y en el 35% de la red de este del país.

 

La pregunta obvia de todo esto es ¿cómo puede un fallo tan grande suceder?. Las causas específicas aún se desconocen, un factor principal es simple oferta y demanda, con la oferta superada por la demanda.

 

Por eso, Think Progress cita el Wall Street Journal:

 

La escasez de combustible está paralizando las plantas de energía a carbón y gas, lo que obliga a suministro por debajo de su capacidad o al corte durante largos períodos. Los servicios públicos estatales tienen miles de millones de dólares de pérdidas acumuladas y como se ha hecho evidente, la obsoleta red de energía de la India, debe modernizarse.

"A menos que este gobierno quiera cometer un suicidio político, no hay manera de que se puede ignorar esto", dijo Abhey Yograj, director gerente de Tecnova, una firma consultora que asesora a las empresas extranjeras en la India.

 

Parte de que las pérdidas acumuladas se deben a que la energía se vende por debajo del costo de producción.

 

La revista PV Magazine reporta que el estado de Gujarat está en conversaciones con la Corporación Financiera Internacional para desarrollar una planta de energía solar de 1 GW.

 

Obviamente, mucho más tendrá que pasar antes de que una gran planta de energía solar sea realidad: plantas incluso más grandes que la propuesta para Gujarat, han acabado en nada. Pero en el largo plazo, está claro que la energía solar es el futuro de la producción de energía, tanto en India como en cualquier otro lugar.

 

 

 

Residents stand under illegally extended electric wires at a slum in Jammu, India, Wednesday, Aug. 1, 2012. Vast amounts of power bleeds out of India's antiquated distribution system is pirated through unauthorized wiring. An estimated 620 million people were left without electricity Tuesday afternoon after India’s northern, eastern and northeastern grids cascaded into failure. Photo: Channi Anand / AP

 

Illegal subsidiary wires are attached to the main cables on an electric pole in New Delhi, India, Wednesday, Aug. 1, 2012. Vast amounts of power bleeds out of India's antiquated distribution system or is pirated through unauthorized wiring. An estimated 620 million people were left without electricity Tuesday afternoon after India’s northern, eastern and northeastern grids cascaded into failure. (Manish Swarup / AP)

Read more: http://www.timesunion.com/news/article/Indian-businesses-weather-blackouts-but-at-a-cost-3752353.php#ixzz22OzpFn1J

 

 

.

Fossil Fuel Supply Shortages Behind India's Largest Power Blackout Ever

 

Following Monday's massive electric grid failure across northern India, and full restoration some 15 hours later, the nation has again been hit by huge power outages, double in size to those just passed.

 

Huffington Post reports that three regional power grids have failed, covering 20 of 28 states, leaving 620 million people without electricity—of course, that's in addition to the hundreds of millions of poor Indians without access to electricity as matter of course. It's the largest electric grid failure in the world.

 

Four hours after beginning, power was restored in the northeast part of the nation, with the 45% of the northern grid, and 35% of the eastern grid restored.

 

The obvious question in all this is how can such a large failure happen. The specific causes are still unknown, one major factor is simple supply and demand, with demand far outstripping supply.

 

On that, Think Progress quotes the Wall Street Journal:

 

Fuel shortages are crippling coal and gas-fired plants, forcing them to run below capacity or shut down for long stretches; state utilities have billions of dollars of accumulated losses; and, as has been on stark display, the nation’s creaky grid needs upgrading.

“Unless this government wants to commit political suicide, there’s no way they can ignore this,” said Abhey Yograj, managing director of Tecnova, a consulting firm that advises foreign companies on India.

 

Part of that accumulated losses stems from power being sold below the cost of production.

 

As with the first blackout, news of part of the solution to India's electricity and energy needs comes at a symbolic (if coincidental) time: PV Magazine reports that the state of Gujarat is in talks with the International Finance Corporation to develop a 1 GW solar power plant.

 

Obviously much would need to happen before such a huge single solar power plant actually gets built—and even larger plants have been proposed in Gujarat and come to nothing. But in the long term, it's clear that solar power is the future of energy production, as much in India as anywhere else.

 

 

http://www.treehugger.com/energy-disasters/fossil-fuel-supply-shortages-behind-india-largest-power-blackout-ever.html

 

      

 

mesh of electric wires on Delhi's poles

 

It happens in India; in Britain too? A news items carried by Daily Express [of Britain] about fixing of a street bulb taking 46 days and 12 visits by workmen amused me. More because it makes news in Britain while it is so routine in India. The story there ended with fixing of the bulb; here in India, we would not be sure.  http://indianewstoday.blogspot.com/

Commuters walk on empty railway tracks at the New Delhi railway station following a power outage in New Delhi, India, Tuesday, July 31, 2012. India's energy crisis cascaded over half the country Tuesday when three of its regional grids collapsed, leaving more than 600 million people without government-supplied electricity in one of the world's biggest-ever blackouts. Photo: Mustafa Quraishi / AP

355 MILLONES DE PERSONAS SIN ELECTRICIDAD EN LA INDIA / PEOR APAGÓN EN 10 AÑOS North India blackout leaves 300 million without electric power 

Indian stranded passengers wait near empty railway tracks for train services to resume at a railway station in New Delhi, India, Tuesday, July 31, 2012. India's energy crisis cascaded over half the country Tuesday when three of its regional grids collapsed, leaving 620 million people without government-supplied electricity for several hours in, by far, the world's biggest-ever blackout. Hundreds of trains stalled across the country and traffic lights went out, causing widespread traffic jams in New Delhi. Photo: Manish Swarup / AP

 

Indian businesses weather blackouts, but at a cost

RAVI NESSMAN, Associated Press Updated 11:04 p.m., Wednesday, August 1, 2012 Read more: http://www.timesunion.com/news/article/Indian-businesses-weather-blackouts-but-at-a-cost-3752353.php#ixzz22OyU07Qx

Indian stranded passengers wait on a platform and some of them on rail tracks for the train services to resume following a power outage at Sealdah station in Kolkata, India, Tuesday, July 31, 2012. India's energy crisis cascaded over half the country Tuesday when three of its regional grids collapsed, leaving 620 million people without government-supplied electricity for several hours in, by far, the world's biggest-ever blackout. Hundreds of trains stalled across the country and traffic lights went out, causing widespread traffic jams in New Delhi. Photo: Bikas Das / AP

.

Indian stranded passengers wait on a platform and some of them on rail tracks for the train services to resume following a power outage at Sealdah station in Kolkata, India, Tuesday, July 31, 2012. India's energy crisis cascaded over half the country Tuesday when three of its regional grids collapsed, leaving 620 million people without government-supplied electricity for several hours in, by far, the world's biggest-ever blackout. Hundreds of trains stalled across the country and traffic lights went out, causing widespread traffic jams in New Delhi. (Bikas Das / AP)

 

Streets are packed in heavy traffics following power outage and rains in the central part of New Delhi, India, Tuesday, July 31, 2012. India's energy crisis spread over half the country Tuesday when both its eastern and northern electricity grids collapsed, leaving 600 million people without power in one of the world's biggest-ever blackouts. Traffic lights went out across New Delhi. Photo: Rajesh Kumar Singh / AP

New Delhi

.

Illegal subsidiary wires are attached to the main cables on an electric pole in New Delhi, India, Wednesday, Aug. 1, 2012. Vast amounts of power bleeds out of India's antiquated distribution system or is pirated through unauthorized wiring. An estimated 620 million people were left without electricity Tuesday afternoon after India’s northern, eastern and northeastern grids cascaded into failure. Photo: Manish Swarup / AP

 

Illegal subsidiary wires are attached to the main cables on an electric pole in New Delhi, India, Wednesday, Aug. 1, 2012. Vast amounts of power bleeds out of India's antiquated distribution system or is pirated through unauthorized wiring. An estimated 620 million people were left without electricity Tuesday afternoon after India’s northern, eastern and northeastern grids cascaded into failure. (Manish Swarup / AP)

.

 

Indian ragpickers work as high tension electricity towers stand in the background in New Delhi, India, Wednesday, Aug. 1, 2012. Factories and workshops across India were up and running again Wednesday, a day after a major system collapse led to a second day of power outages and the worst blackout in history leaving an estimated 620 million people without electricity. Photo: Kevin Frayer / AP 

India Electrical Mess

 

India Wiring Mess

.

Maybe you have seen pictures like these in some of the emails that have been circulating.  Even so, you have to agree this is just plain stupid.  I have actually been to India, both New Delhi and Hyderabad, and I have to confess I never saw anything this bad.  I also know that they do have an electric company that you call if you want power to your building.  Maybe they aren’t up to USA standards, but this is nuts. 

We did experience power outages almost every day, you just get used to them.  But I never considered the outages might be a result of two wires touching because somebody tossed something in the air, or decided to hang their laundry on the closest line.   I would love to know where this actually is, and how widespread this situation might be.  Any enlightenment out there?

Technorati Tags: indiahyderabadnew delhielectrical mess

      A Kashmiri mechanic repairs electric generators used as backup during power outages in Srinagar, India, Wednesday, Aug 1, 2012. Factories and workshops across India were up and running again Wednesday, a day after a major system collapse led to a second day of power outages and the worst blackout in history. An estimated 620 million people were left without electricity after India's northern, eastern and northeastern grids cascaded into failure Tuesday afternoon. Photo: Mukhtar Khan / AP

 

 

A Kashmiri mechanic repairs electric generators used as backup during power outages in Srinagar, India, Wednesday, Aug 1, 2012. Factories and workshops across India were up and running again Wednesday, a day after a major system collapse led to a second day of power outages and the worst blackout in history. An estimated 620 million people were left without electricity after India's northern, eastern and northeastern grids cascaded into failure Tuesday afternoon. (Mukhtar Khan / AP)

Read more: http://www.timesunion.com/news/article/Indian-businesses-weather-blackouts-but-at-a-cost-3752353.php#ixzz22P0Q0a00

 

Por cinabrio - Publicado en: GUERRAS DEL PETROLEO
Escribir un comentario - Ver los 0 comentarios
Saturday 16 june 2012 6 16 /06 /Jun /2012 21:35

799px-FalklandEconomicZone.png

Economic zone of Malvinas Islands

 

¿welcome a British referendum on Falkland Isles ?...

.

 

 

File:LocationFalklandIslands.png

 

Los políticos británicos de las Islas Malvinas anunciaron un referéndum en el que le consultarán a los ciudadanos malvinenses si querrán seguir con su estatus de británicos o preferirán ser argentinos y regidos por el gobierno de Buenos Aires.

 

Más que un referéndum se trata de una treta de propaganda para dejar por sentado lo que ya todos saben. Por ello, cuando la noticia surcó los cielos del Atlántico Sur – justo en momentos que el gobierno de Cristina de Kirchner está por demandar a petroleras internacionales que explotan el subsuelo submarino cerca de las islas y se apresta a viajar a Nueva York para representar a la Argentina en la sesión por Malvinas del Comité de Descolonización de las Naciones Unidas – el primer ministro británico, James Cameron, ni lerdo ni perezoso, dijo que el Reino Unido “respetará y defenderá” el resultado de la votación.

 

El referéndum, anunciado para la “primera mitad de 2013” por el presidente de la Asamblea Legislativa de las islas, Gavin Short, carece de validez. 

 

.

6a00d8341d417153ef016760d50f9b970b-800wihhhhhhh.png

 

File:Coa Falkland.svg

.

 

Referéndum en Malvinas - Una trampa

.

Todos quieren hacer política doméstica ahora que apareció el petróleo

.

El gobierno británico, por necesidades de política doméstica, anunció que en el primer semestre de 2013 promoverá un referéndum en las islas Malvinas a fin de que la población se pronuncie "de manera definitiva" si quieren ser británicos o argentinos. 

.

sábado 16 de junio de 2012 ADOLFO P. SALGUEIRO |  EL UNIVERSAL

.

Así presentado existiría la tentación inicial de convenir en que un referéndum "para que la gente se pronuncie" es una solución acorde con el principio de autonomía de los pueblos. La verdad es bastante diferente. 

 

Las Malvinas fueron parte del virreinato del Río de la Plata en la época colonial. Por tal razón -igual que en el resto del continente- es la nueva nación independiente (Argentina) quien asume la soberanía en carácter de sucesora de España. 

 

En 1832 Gran Bretaña, por la fuerza ejercida por buques de guerra, expulsa al gobernador argentino y se establece en las islas, cosa que continúa hasta hoy. En el curso de los casi doscientos años siguientes esos parajes solo sirvieron para la cría de ovejas hasta que aparecieron hidrocarburos en las aguas circundantes. Vale decir que hoy, la posible bonanza petrolera que se asoma, produce que la potencia colonial, en un bien calculado rapto de "democracia", promueva el referéndum que nunca se hizo antes. 

 

El punto consiste en que desde el desalojo de Argentina de las islas, dejó de haber argentinos. Quienes ocuparon aquellas tierras fueron ingleses, no más de tres mil, casi todos empleados de la única empresa allí existente: la Falkland Island Company. Nunca se permitió el acceso con carácter fijo a ciudadanos argentinos provenientes del continente que solo dista doscientos kilómetros. Se promovió la llegada de ingleses traídos desde miles de millas de distancia y -de paso- se les dio tratamiento "de segunda clase" con menores derechos que sus pares de Gran Bretaña. 

 

Quien esto escribe ha sido testigo de un caso similar en la República Árabe Saharaui (en África), excolonia de España que abandonó el área en 1975 dando lugar a que Marruecos por el norte y Mauritania por el sur ocuparan el vacío de soberanía. Mauritania pronto se retiró y Marruecos ocupó las tierras a través de la "Marcha Verde" que consistió en el desplazamiento forzado de la población existente y su sustitución por una nueva. Luego de años de violencia Naciones Unidas resuelve hacer un referéndum y como es de suponer el resultado del mismo dependerá de si los votantes son los que estaban allí en 1975 o los que están ahora. Por eso no se ha podido celebrar. De paso, en casi cuarenta años muchos de los pobladores originales han muerto o se han ido. ¿Será válido un referéndum allí sin antes resolver ese asunto? Pues lo mismo en las Malvinas. 

 

De paso la presidenta Kirchner, atravesando una crisis económica importante con posibles implicaciones sociales, también ha encontrado rentabilidad política para aprovechar el trigésimo aniversario de la guerra de 1982 para agitar la reivindicación territorial a la que -sin lugar a dudas- su país tiene derecho. En definitiva, todos quieren hacer política doméstica valiéndose del tema Malvinas de una u otra manera, más ahora que apareció el petróleo. 

 

.

 

 

 

Gobierno "escuche" el resultado del referéndum en Malvinas

.

El premier británico dijo espera que, con la votación, los habitantes de Malvinas hablen "fuerte y alto" y que Argentina deje de ignorarlos.

 

Malvinas, guerra de Malvinas, Reino Unido, ONU, Naciones Unidas, descolonización, David Cameron

13/06/12 - 14:22

Fuerte respaldo tuvieron los habitantes de Malvinas tras anunciar que en 2013 llevarán a cabo un referéndum para definir su estatus político. A las palabras de apoyo de varios funcionarios británicos, hoy se sumó el propio El primer ministro David Cameron. El mandatario dijo hoy que espera que los isleños hablen "fuerte y alto" y que Argentina "escuche" el resultado de la votación.

 

"Los habitantes de las Falklands (sic) han decidido celebrar un referéndum para demostrar que creen en la autodeterminación y creo que es muy importante, porque Argentina trata continuamente de ocultar este argumento y pretende que las opiniones de los isleños no importan", declaró Cameron en la tradicional sesión semanal de preguntas en el Parlamento.

 

"Espero que hablen fuerte y claro y que Argentina escuche", agregó en la víspera de la conmemoración del 30 aniversario del fin de la guerra de Malvinas.

 

El parlamentario conservador Nigel Adams le preguntó a Cameron sobre el estatus de posibles préstamos a Argentina. "Mientras recordamos a los caídos hace 30 años durante la Guerra de Malvinas, Argentina sigue disputando la soberanía británica de esas islas. Sin embargo, Argentina sigue recibiendo préstamos por un valor de miles de millones de libras esterlinas del Banco Mundial, del que los contribuyentes británicos son accionistas principales. ¿Se sumará el primer ministro al presidente (Barack) Obama en instruir a sus funcionarios a votar en contra de cualquier otro préstamo a Argentina?", preguntó Adams.

 

El legislador hacía referencia a la votación estadounidense de septiembre del año pasado en el BID para negar préstamos a la Argentina, algo que Obama definió luego como "un pequeño asunto técnico".

 

En su respuesta, Cameron dijo que el diputado "trató un punto importante". "Ningún dinero del erario británico es gastado en préstamos del Banco Mundial a Argentina. Eso es importante. Pero creo que incluso más importante es lo que pasó ayer cuando los habitantes de las Faklands (sic) decidieron que van a tener un referéndum para demostrar que creen en la autodeterminación", sostuvo el mandatario.

 

"Esto es muy importante porque Argentina trata continuamente de esconder este argumento y pretender que la opinión de los isleños no importa. Sí que importa, y espero que ellos hablen con voz bien en alto y claramente, y que Argentina los escuche", subrayó.

 

El gobierno autónomo del archipiélago anunció ayer que celebrará un referéndum en el primer semestre de 2013 para dejar en claro el deseo de los isleños y zanjar el asunto de la soberanía.

 

Hasta ahora, ni la presidenta Cristina Kirchner, que renovará mañana el reclamo argentino de soberanía ante el Comité de Descolonización de la ONU en Nueva York, ni ningún otro miembro de su gobierno reaccionó a ese inesperado anuncio.

 

Sí lo hicieron varios funcionarios como el secretario de Estado de Relaciones Exteriores David Lidington, quien reafirmó que la consulta tenía el "pleno respaldo" del Reino Unido.

 

"En el pasado las islas Falkland (sic) han dejado claro que desean seguir siendo un territorio autónomo de ultramar británico (...) No tienen interés en convertirse en una provincia de Argentina", declaró Lidington a los diputados.

 

El referéndum proporcionará a sus habitantes "un medio legal, justo y decisivo" para expresar su punto de vista, agregó. "Espero que Argentina y, es más, toda la comunidad internacional, tomen nota de la opinión democrática y libremente expresada de los isleños".

 

"El gobierno británico seguirá ofreciendo un apoyo inequívoco a los isleños manteniendo una postura defensiva en las islas, respaldando su creciente economía, protegiendo sus derechos y deseos como hicimos hace 30 años", afirmó.

 

El 30° aniversario del conflicto estuvo marcado por una escalada verbal entre ambos países, y reclamos argentinos por la "militarización" de la zona y la exploración de posibles recursos petroleros en esa región.

 

Incluso, el Gobierno argentino -que ha logrado el apoyo de los países latinoamericanos en el diferendo incluida la decisión de países del Mercosur de prohibir el ingreso a sus respectivos puertos de buques con pabellón de Malvinas- anunció la semana pasada acciones legales contra las cinco petroleras británicas que llevan a cabo en aguas del archipiélago una exploración que consideran "ilegítima".

 

Naciones Unidas demanda desde 1965 a las partes que se sienten a negociar sobre la soberanía de las Islas Malvinas, pero Londres se niega. Además, la ONU no reconoce la autodeterminación de sus habitantes dado que no los considera población originaria sino implantada.

 

.

 

http://www.clarin.com/politica/Cameron-Gobierno-resultado-referendum-Malvinas_0_718128411.html

.

 

800px-Flag_of_the_Falkland_Islands.svg.png

File:Argentine POWs guarded by 2 Para.jpg

British paratroopers guard Argentineprisoners of war http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falkland_Islands

 

.

Falkland Islands: We Plan Referendum on Our Future

 

.

The Falkland Islands government said Tuesday it plans a referendum next year on the political future of the tiny south Atlantic archipelago, seeking to end Argentina's claims of sovereignty and to secure its status as a British territory.

.

By DAVID STRINGER Associated Press

LONDON June 12, 2012 (AP)

.

 

Gavin Short, chairman of the Falklands' legislature, made the announcement ahead of Thursday's 30th anniversary of the end of the brief 1982 war between Britain and Argentina over the islands, which saw more than 900 people die.

 

Tensions have risen ahead of the June 14 anniversary, with Argentina's President Cristina Fernandez planning to press her country's case at a meeting of the U.N.'s decolonization committee to be held on Thursday in New York.

 

Short said he hoped that a referendum would help the Falklanders "convey a strong message to the outside world," about their desire to retain ties to London.

 

"We are holding this referendum not because we have any doubts about who we are and what future we want, but to show the world just how very certain we are about that," Short said in a statement.

 

He said that he had no doubt that the people of the Falklands "wish for the islands to remain a self-governing overseas territory of the United Kingdom."

 

 

 

British Prime Minister David Cameron said the U.K. would abide by whatever choice the islanders make when they hold their vote — and urged Argentina and its allies to do the same.

 

"Britain will respect and defend their choice. We look to all U.N. members to live up to their responsibilities under the U.N. charter and accept the islanders' decision about how they want to live," he said.

 

Argentines insist Britain has illegally occupied the islands they call the Islas Malvinas since 1833. Britain accuses Buenos Aires of ignoring the wishes of the island's population of about 3,000 people.

 

A total of 649 Argentines and 255 British soldiers died in the 1982 war fought between the nations over the archipelago, prompted by the Argentine invasion of the islands.

 

"Thirty years ago they made clear that they wanted to stay British," Cameron said. "That's why British forces bravely liberated the islands from Argentine invaders."

 

Britain's Latin American minister Jeremy Browne, who arrived in the Falklands on Sunday for a week-long visit, said the referendum would give the population a chance to "send a clear message — not just to Argentina, but to the whole of the international community — that the Islanders, and they alone, are masters of their fate."

 

Browne has criticized Argentina's recent attempts to stifle the islands' economy by turning away cruise ships carrying the British flag, restricting flights that pass through the islands from its own airspace and launching lawsuits against five British companies involved in oil exploration off the coast of the Falklands.

 

Cameron's office said the Falklands government had discussed its plans for a referendum with Britain, but insisted it had no role in prompting the decision.

 

"They discussed it with us, but it's their decision and we support it," said a spokeswoman for Cameron's office, on condition of anonymity in line with policy.

 

 

      http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/falkland-islands-plan-referendum-future-16547989#.T9ziSReomNs

 

.

 

    1. Informe21.com (Sátira)‎ - hace 21 horas
  1. Las Malvinas definirán en un referéndum su estatus político - Mundo ...
    mexico.cnn.com/.../las-malvinas-definiran-en-un-referendum-su-estat... hace 4 días – Los habitantes de las islas pretenden dejar en claro cuál es su deseo respecto a Gran Bretaña y Argentina.
  2. Las Islas Malvinas/Falkland votarán en referéndum sobre su futuro ...
    cnnespanol.cnn.com/.../las-islas-malvinasfalkland-votaran-en-referen... hace 4 días – (CNN) -- El gobierno de las Islas Falkland o Malvinas anunció este jueves que celebrará un referéndum sobre su situación política en el primer ...

    .

    1. El Gobierno de Malvinas hará un referéndum sobre el estatus de las ...
      www.elmundo.es/america/2012/06/12/argentina/1339506304.html hace 4 días – Malvinas hará un referéndum El Ejecutivo de las islas quiere que sus ciudadanos se pronuncien el año próximo para terminar definitivamente ...
    2. 180: Canciller británico aplaude referéndum en Malvinas
      www.180.com.uy/.../26796_Canciller-britanico-aplaude-referendum-... hace 3 días – 180.com.uy Portal de noticias y actualidad sobre Uruguay y el Mundo.
    3. Malvinas va a referéndum por su soberanía | Urgente24

      www.urgente24.com/200494-malvinas-va-a-referendum-por-su-sobe...
      hace 4 días – Archipiélago Malvinas/Falkland. Las autoridades de las Islas Malvinas realizarán un referéndum para decidir si siguen perteneciendo a Reino ...
    4. Canciller británico complacido con referéndum en Malvinas ...
      www.espectador.com/1v4/redirect/index.php?m=id&id=241356 hace 4 días – El canciller británico William Hague ve con buenos ojos el anuncio del Gobierno de las Islas Malvinas o Falklands de realizar un referéndum ...
    800px-Gypsy-Cove.jpg
    .
    Penguins at Gypsy Cove on Malvinas 

 

 

 

Por cinabrio - Publicado en: GUERRAS DEL PETROLEO
Escribir un comentario - Ver los 0 comentarios
Wednesday 14 march 2012 3 14 /03 /Mar /2012 21:42

Wikileaks desvela que la OTAN tiene comandos militares en Siria

 

Se encontrarían haciendo labores de reconocimiento y entrenamiento de grupos armados de rebeldes sirios

 

 

PÚBLICO.ES MADRID 14/03/2012

 

Los millones de emails de la compañía privada de espionaje Stratfor, 'la CIA en la sombra', publicados por Wikileaks, lo han dejado de manifiesto.

 

No en vano, entre los clientes de esta empresa de inteligencia se encuentran servicios secretos, los ministerios de Defensa, de Exteriores y las embajadas de la mayoría de los países industrializados, incluida España, e incluso grandes multinacionales.

 

El director de análisis de Stratfor, Reva Bhalla, se reunió en diciembre de 2011 en el Pentágono con altos representantes de las Fuerzas Armadas de los EEUU (USAF), según un email interno de la compañía en el que él mismo informaba del encuentro. En la reunión habrían estado presentes, además de los representantes de las fuerzas armadas estadounidenses, un enlace británico y otro francés.

 

Lo que se desprendió del encuentro, según palabras de Bhalla, es que existen grupos del ejército estadounidense "operando" en Siria. "Pasé la mayor parte de la tarde en el Pentágono con el grupo de estudios estratégicos de la USAF", explica en el email.

 

 

Asimismo, la presencia militar occidental en Siria se debería, en parte, a criterios de estrategia geopolítica, sobre todo de cara a Irán. "Hay todavía un nivel muy bajo de comprensión de lo que está en juego en Siria, cuál es el interés estratégico allí, el papel turco, el papel iraní, etc.", explica Bhalla.

 

"Tras unas horas de charla, dieron a entender que equipos de Fuerzas de Operaciones Especiales (SOF, en inglés) -presumiblemente de los EEUU, Reino Unido, Francia, Jordania y Turquía- se encuentran ya en el terreno enfocados en misiones de reconocimiento y entrenamiento de fuerzas de oposición".

 

Bhalla, en su narración del encuentro, cuenta cómo un agente de la inteligencia de las Fuerzas Aéreas estadounidenses afirmó que "no hay mucho del Ejército Libre Sirio para entrenar justo ahora, pero todas las operaciones que están realizando en estos momentos se están haciendo sin prudencia".

 

Una campaña aérea, descartada por el momento

Cuando Bhalla indagó en la reunión sobre una posible intervención aérea para dar apoyo a los rebeldes sirios, los agentes del SOF "se distanciaron rápidamente de la idea, afirmando que la ideaes ‘hipotéticamente' cometer ataques guerrilleros, campañas de asesinatos, intentar romper la columna vertebral de las fuerzas Alauitas, haciendo que colapsen desde el interior".

 

 

"Enfatizaron cómo una campaña aérea en Siria haría a Libia parecer un trozo de pastel", cuenta Bhalla, ya que las defensas aéreas de Damasco y en la frontera con Israel y Turquía son "más robustas y mucho más densas".

 

"Dicen que la mayoría de los aviones de combate estadounidense han salido ya de Irak y han sido transferidos a Kuwait. Explicaron que esa es la belleza de la fuerza aérea, la base de Kuwait es sólo un salto desde sus bases en Europa, lo que hace muy fácil acumular cuando lo necesitan.

 

 

http://www.publico.es/internacional/425868/wikileaks-desvela-que-la-otan-tiene-comandos-militares-en-siria

 

.

 

.

Damage analysis in Baba Amr. Red circles represent damaged buildings while yellow circles show impact craters. Image by Digital Globe, analysis by Human Rights Watch

.

a wounded Syrian under treatment at a makeshift hospital in a house in the Baba Amr district of the central city of Homs
Wounded Syrian under treatment at a makeshift hospital in a house in the Baba Amr district of the central city of Homs

Syria uprising: live

14/3/2012 - Live coverage of developments in Syria, as David Cameron calls for Bashar al-Assad's "criminal" regime to be held to account and the Red Cross poised to enter Baba Amr.

 

a wounded Syrian under treatment at a makeshift hospital in a house in the Baba Amr district of the central city of Homs
Wounded Syrian under treatment at a makeshift hospital in a house in the Baba Amr district of the central city of Homs

Members of Free Syrian Army are seen deployed in al-Bayada, Homs

Members of Free Syrian Army are seen deployed in al-Bayada, Homs
Members of Free Syrian Army are seen deployed in al-Bayada, Homs

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/9064047/Syria-uprising-live.html

.

.

 

INTERVENCIÓN DE LA OTAN EN SIRIA: ¿A QUIÉN HAY QUE CREERLE?

 

Publicado: 02 mar 2012 |

El representante permanente de Estados Unidos ante la OTAN, Ivo Daalder, aseguró después de la sesión del consejo de relaciones exteriores en Chicago que es poco probable que el organismo tenga que realizar una operación militar en Siria. Sin embargo, esas declaraciones carecen de credibilidad si se tienen en cuenta una serie de hechos que demuestran lo contrario.

"Honestamente, dudo que nos veamos forzados a comenzar una operación militar en Siria", afirmó Daalder, al ser consultado por los periodistas sobre los criterios con que evalúa una intervención militar en otros países.

Esta opinión contrasta con la de varios analistas, como Nagham Salman, experta en asuntos de Medio Oriente y bloguera de RT,quien sugiere que "el objetivo a corto plazo es debilitar al país para llevar a cabo una intervención externa a mediano plazo, posiblemente a inicios de primavera, cuando según todos los indicios se lanzaría un ataque coordinado contra Siria e Irán. Y ello sería una catástrofe para toda la región". (Lea el blog completo aquí).

Otras declaraciones, como la emitida por la alianza opositora conocida como Consejo Nacional Sirio, también dan a entender la posible intención de la OTAN de propiciar una intervención armada organizada desde otros países. El CNS anunció la creación de un comité militar, destinado a controlar las acciones de las agrupaciones antigubernamentales en Siria y lo más probable es que tenga su sede en Turquía, según informó este miércoles desde París el jefe del CNS Burhan Ghalioun.

La OTAN no prevé "vientos de cambio"

El representante de EE. UU. ante la OTAN también se refirió al papel que jugará en adelante la Alianza en Afganistán, sobre lo cual dio a entender que la política de acción en ese país no variará, a pesar del reciente escándalo generado por la quema de varios ejemplares del Corán perpetrada por militares estadounidenses.

"Condenamos lo que ha pasado en los últimos días, esto es simplemente inaceptable", dijo Daalder. "Pero no podemos permitir que incidentes aislados, aunque sean trágicos, determinen nuestra política", añadió. "Creemos que llevamos el curso correcto y lo mantendremos hasta el final", aseguró.

El escándalo estalló el pasado 20 de febrero, cuando en la base de Bagram decenas de libros sagrados confiscados en una cárcel cercana, fueron quemados. Según la versión del Pentágono, los presos usaron los textos para pasarse notas.

Como resultado, se han hecho más frecuentes los casos de ataques de soldados afganos a militares de la OTAN, razón por la que muchos miembros de la alianza retiraron sus consejeros militares de Kabul.

Los últimos acontecimientos ponen en tela de juicio el retiro total del contingente militar de la OTAN en Afganistán para el 2014, especialmente, si se toma en consideración que EE. UU. planea mantener allí a consejeros militares para entrenar a los soldados afganos.

http://actualidad.rt.com/actualidad/internacional/issue_36953.html

 

 


Syrian army gun purportedly firing towards Zabadani,

Syrian army gun purportedly firing towards Zabadani,

.

Ahmed, a Free Syrian Army supporter chants anti government slogans under snowfall on the outskirts of Idlib , north Syria
Ahmed, a Free Syrian Army supporter chants anti government slogans under snowfall on the outskirts of Idlib , north Syria

.

Syrian army tanks as they apparently roll towards Huran in the southern Daraa region of Syria
Image 7 of 7
Syrian army tanks as they apparently roll towards Huran in the southern Daraa region of Syria 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/9064047/Syria-uprising-live.html

 

.

 

On Monday February 27th, 2012, WikiLeaks began publishing The Global Intelligence Files, over five million e-mails from the Texas headquartered "global intelligence" company Stratfor. The e-mails date between July 2004 and late December 2011. They reveal the inner workings of a company that fronts as an intelligence publisher, but provides confidential intelligence services to large corporations, such as Bhopal's Dow Chemical Co., Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon and government agencies, including the US Department of Homeland Security, the US Marines and the US Defence Intelligence Agency. The emails show Stratfor's web of informers, pay-off structure, payment laundering techniques and psychological methods.

Re: INSIGHT - military intervention in Syria, post withdrawal status of forces

That makes sense. No one is planning a war.
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T

----------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Reva Bhalla 
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 19:04:13 -0600 (CST)
To: 
Subject: Re: INSIGHT - military intervention in Syria, post withdrawal
status of forces
the NATO forces that conducted the Libya campaign are still in
replenishment mode. i asked how long it would take to replenish their
supplies and be ready for another operations, and they said depending on
the orders they get it could be done in a matter of weeks if needed, but
they haven't been put on that kind of an urgent schedule yet

----------------------------------------------------------------------

From: "Reva Bhalla" 
To: secure@stratfor.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 6, 2011 6:57:59 PM
Subject: Re: INSIGHT - military intervention in Syria, post withdrawal
status of forces

sorry, just remembering more bits.

when we were talking about wehther the US would be able to convey the
message to Iran starting in 2012 that the US isn't going anywhere, they
stressed that Iran has its eyes all over Ali al Salim air base in Kuwait. 
Expect to see a pretty signfiicant build=up of aircraft there

----------------------------------------------------------------------

From: "Reva Bhalla" 
To: secure@stratfor.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 6, 2011 6:55:29 PM
Subject: Re: INSIGHT - military intervention in Syria, post withdrawal
status of forces

one more thing, i was talking on the way out to one of the USAF women in
the office who introduced me to her husband working out of the J8 Force
Structure office. When we were talking about Iran, she was talking about
how incredible some of the imagery was coming out of Isfahan post-blast.
It was pretty clear that she was talking sabotage ops. Those blasts
weren't all accidental

----------------------------------------------------------------------

From: "Reva Bhalla" 
To: secure@stratfor.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 6, 2011 6:49:18 PM
Subject: INSIGHT - military intervention in Syria, post withdrawal status
of forces

A few points I wanted to highlight from meetings today --

I spent most of the afternoon at the Pentagon with the USAF strategic
studies group - guys who spend their time trying to understand and explain
to the USAF chief the big picture in areas where they're operating in. It
was just myself and four other guys at the Lieutenant Colonel level,
including one French and one British representative who are liaising with
the US currently out of DC.

They wanted to grill me on the strategic picture on Syria, so after that I
got to grill them on the military picture. There is still a very low level
of understanding of what is actually at stake in Syria, what's the
strategic interest there, the Turkish role, the Iranian role, etc. After a
couple hours of talking, they said without saying that SOF teams
(presumably from US, UK, France, Jordan, Turkey) are already on the ground
focused on recce missions and training opposition forces. One Air Force
intel guy (US) said very carefully that there isn't much of a Free Syrian
Army to train right now anyway, but all the operations being done now are
being done out of 'prudence.' The way it was put to me was, 'look at this
way - the level of information known on Syrian OrBat this month is the
best it's been since 2001.' They have been told to prepare contingencies
and be ready to act within 2-3 months, but they still stress that this is
all being done as contingency planning, not as a move toward escalation.

I kept pressing on the question of what these SOF teams would be working
toward, and whether this would lead to an eventual air camapign to give a
Syrian rebel group cover. They pretty quickly distanced themselves from
that idea, saying that the idea 'hypothetically' is to commit guerrilla
attacks, assassination campaigns, try to break the back of the Alawite
forces, elicit collapse from within. There wouldn't be a need for air
cover, and they wouldn't expect these Syrian rebels to be marching in
columns anyway.

They emphasized how the air campaign in Syria makes Libya look like a
piece of cake. Syrian air defenses are a lot more robust and are much
denser, esp around Damascus and on the borders with Israel, Turkey. THey
are most worried about mobile air defenses, particularly the SA-17s that
they've been getting recently. It's still a doable mission, it's just not
an easy one.

The main base they would use is Cyprus, hands down. Brits and FRench would
fly out of there. They kept stressing how much is stored at Cyprus and how
much recce comes out of there. The group was split on whether Turkey would
be involved, but said Turkey would be pretty critical to the mission to
base stuff out of there. EVen if Turkey had a poltiical problem with
Cyprus, they said there is no way the Brits and the FRench wouldn't use
Cyprus as their main air force base. Air Force Intel guy seems pretty
convinced that the Turks won't participate (he seemed pretty pissed at
them.)

There still seems to be a lot of confusion over what a military
intervention involving an air campaign would be designed to achieve. It
isn't clear cut for them geographically like in Libya, and you can't just
create an NFZ over Homs, Hama region. This would entail a countrywide SEAD
campaign lasting the duration of the war. They dont believe air
intervention would happen unless there was enough media attention on a
massacre, like the Ghadafi move against Benghazi. They think the US would
have a high tolerance for killings as long as it doesn't reach that very
public stage. Theyre also questiioning the skills of the Syrian forces
that are operating the country's air defenses currently and how
signfiicant the Iranian presence is there. Air Force Intel guy is most
obsessed with the challenge of taking out Syria's ballistic missile
capabilities and chem weapons. With Israel rgiht there and the regime
facing an existential crisis, he sees that as a major complication to any
military intervention.

The post 2011 SOFA with Iraq is still being negotiated. These guys were
hoping that during Biden's visit that he would announce a deal with
Maliki, but no such luck. They are gambling ont he idea that the Iraqis
remember the iran-iraq war and that maliki is not going to want to face
the threat of Iranian jets entering Iraqi air space. THey say that most
US fighter jets are already out of Iraq and transferred to Kuwait. They
explained that's the beauty of the air force, the base in Kuwait is just a
hop, skip and jump away from their bases in Europe, ie. very easy to
rapidly build up when they need to. They don't seem concerned about the
US ability to restructure its forces to send a message to Iran. They gave
the example of the USS Enterprise that was supposed to be out of
commission already and got extended another couple years to send to the
gulf. WHen the US withdraws, we'll have at least 2 carriers in the gulf
out of centcom and one carrier in the Med out of EuCom. I asked if the
build-up in Kuwait and the carrier deployments are going to be enough to
send a message to Iran that the US isn't going anywhere. They responded
that Iran will get the message if they read the Centcom Web Site. STarting
Jan. 1 expect them to be publishing all over the place where the US is
building up.

Another concern they have about an operation in Syria is whether Iran
could impede operations out of Balad air force base in Iraq.

The French representative was of hte opinion that Syria won't be a
libya-type situation in that France would be gung-ho about going in. Not
in an election year. The UK rep also emphasized UK reluctance but said
that the renegotiation of the EU treaty undermines the UK role and that UK
would be looking for ways to reassert itself on the continent ( i dont
really think a syria campaign is the way to do that.) UK guy mentioned as
an aside that the air force base commander at Cyprus got switched out from
a maintenance guy to a guy that flew Raptors, ie someone that understands
what it means to start dropping bombs. He joked that it was probably a
coincidence.

Prior to that, I had a meeting with an incoming Kuwaiti diplomat (will be
coded as KU301.) His father was high up in the regime, always by the
CP's/PM's side. The diplo himself still seems to be getting his feet wet
in DC (the new team just arrived less than 2 weeks ago,) but he made
pretty clear that Kuwait was opening the door to allowing US to build up
forces as needed. THey already have a significant presence there, and a
lot of them will be on 90-day rotations. He also said that the SOFA that
the US signs with Baghdad at the last minute will be worded in such a way
that even allowing one trainer in the country can be construed to mean
what the US wants in terms of keeping forces in Iraq. Overall, I didnt get
the impression from him that Kuwait is freaked out about the US leaving. 
Everyhting is just getting rearranged. The Kuwaitis used to be much
better at managing their relations with Iran, but ever since that spy ring
story came out a year ago, it's been bad. He doesn't think Iran has
significant covert capabililiteis in the GCC states, though they are
trying. Iranian activity is mostly propaganda focused. He said that while
KSA and Bahrain they can deal with it as needed and black out the media,
Kuwait is a lot more open and thus provides Iran with more oppotunity to
shape perceptions (he used to work in inforamtion unit in Kuwait.) He says
there is a sig number of kuwaitis that listen to Iranian media like Al
Alam especially.

On the Kuwaiti political scene - the government is having a harder time
dealing with a more emboldened opposition, but the opposition is still
extremely divided, esp among the Islamists. The MPs now all have to go
back to their tribes to rally support for the elections to take place in
Feb. Oftentimes an MP in Kuwait city will find out that he has lost
support back home with the tribe, and so a lot of moeny is handed out.The
govt is hoping that witha clean slate they can quiet the opposition down.
A good way of managing the opposition he said is to refer cases to the
courts, where they can linger forever. good way for the govt to buy time. 
He doesnt believe the Arab League will take significant action against
Syria - no one is interested in military intervention. they just say it to
threaten it.

 

 

http://wikileaks.org/gifiles/docs/204627_re-insight-military-intervention-in-syria-post-withdrawal.html

 

.

 

 

Email-ID 204627
Date 2011-12-07 02:05:46
From friedman@att.blackberry.net
To bhalla@stratfor.com
Por cinabrio - Publicado en: GUERRAS DEL PETROLEO
Escribir un comentario - Ver los 0 comentarios

Présenta

  • : cinabrio blog
  • cinabrio blog
  • : Ciencia
  • : Ecología y sostenibilidad socioambiental, énfasis en conservación de ríos y ecosistemas, denuncia de impacto de megaproyectos. Todo esto es indesligable de la política y por ello esta también se observa. Ecology, social and environmental sustainability, emphasis on conservation of rivers and ecosystems, denounces impact of megaprojects. All this is inseparable from politics, for it, the politics is also evaluated.
  • Recomendar este blog
  • Volver a la página principal
  • Contacto

Créer un Blog

Recherche

Calendrier

May 2013
M T W T F S S
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    
<< < > >>

Perfil

  • cinabrio
  • cinabrio blog
  • Biólogo desde hace más de treinta años, desde la época en que aún los biólogos no eran empleados de los abogados ambientalistas. Actualmente preocupado …alarmado en realidad, por el LESIVO TRATADO DE(DES)INTEGRACIÓN ENERGÉTICA CON BRASIL
Crear un blog en OverBlog - Contacto - C.G.U - Remuneración por el programa "Gana con tu Blog" - Reportar un abuso - Artículos más comentados