Lloyd Blankfein, chief executive officer (CEO) of Goldman Sachs claimed that he was "doing God's work"
El megalobby global: Goldman Sachs, la obra de Dios
En noviembre de 2009, Lloyd Blankfein, el consejero delegado (CEO) de Goldman Sachs, atraía la atención mediática por las desorbitadas cifras de las primas anuales (bonus) repartidas entre los altos empleados. Además, en una muy comentada entrevista del Sunday Times de Londres defendía esas retribuciones milmillonarias diciendo que era una medida relacionada con el rendimiento a largo plazo; y para escándalo general aseguraba que como banquero estaba “haciendo el trabajo de Dios” (Doing God´s Work) porque “tenemos un fin social. Ayudamos a las compañías a crecer ayudándoles a recaudar capital. Las compañías que crecen crean riqueza. A su vez, esto permite a la gente tener puestos de trabajo que traen más crecimiento y más riqueza. Es un círculo virtuoso”.
Como en tantas ocasiones este alto ejecutivo neoyorquino confundía los negocios virtuales de especulación financiera en beneficio de unos cuantos con la economía real que es la que crea riqueza y empleo.
Meses antes de la citada entrevista, el periodista investigador Matt Taibbi en la revista Rolling Stone Magazine (julio de 2009), daba una imagen más precisa y acertada del funcionamiento de este banco de negocios que tuvo gran eco mediático:
“Lo primero que se necesita saber sobre Goldman Sachs es que está en todas partes. El más potente banco de inversiones del mundo es un gran calamar- vampiro (Vampire squid) que cubre la faz de la humanidad, atiborrando sus vasos sanguíneos con algo que huela a dinero”.
Mucho se ha escrito sobre la inmensa dimensión y poder de Goldman Sachs en los EEUU, de su incesante puerta giratoria entre el banco, los organismos reguladores y la élite política en Washington. Pero Goldman Sachs cultiva los contactos con el poder político en todo el mundo; y no solamente en la capital de los EEUU sino en Nueva York (es el asesor bancario del periódico The New York Times) como en las monarquías autoritarias del Golfo y en Israel, aunque sobre todo su influencia política se deja sentir en Europa…
(Los párrafos anteriores están tomados de la presentación del extenso capítulo del libro Los lobbies financieros, tentáculos del poder; donde se registran las principales intervenciones de estos miembros de Goldman Sachs, calificados como “dueños de la Eurozona” en el gráfico del periódico inglés The Independent que reproducimos aquí)
- Goldman Sachs no sólo sobrevivir, fue rescatado
- Goldman Sachs beneficio bonanza podría avivar la ira
- Goldman Sachs on pace for record bonuses: report
- Goldman Sachs dice que “las piscinas oscuro” ayudar a los inversores
- Solyndra mal ajeno como Goldman Sachs jugado un papel clave
- Invierno de Google Huevo de Pascua: Let It Snow In Search
- Juegos de Pascua: Inicio Aplicaciones iOS
- Goldman Sachs Encuentra reducción del gasto público frena el crecimiento, el columnista del Post Michael Gerson dice Frente
- Angry Birds Seasons Obtiene Eggciting con la Semana Santa de actualización
- Hack Rastreador de los compradores de Kinect es como Google Analytics para estanterías de las tiendas al por menor
- Declaración de Goldman Avances de la Fed, resta importancia a expectativas de una “sorpresa Pesimista”
Goldman Sachs atraca en Gijón con miles de toneladas de carbón colombiano en plena huelga de mineros
NY Times destapa vínculos entre Goldman Sachs y tráfico sexual de menores
Goldman: especulación e impunidad
Goldman Sachs gobierna España
Un directivo de Goldman Sachs se jactaba de ganar 50 millones de dólares en un día
Europa: Democracia a lo Goldman Sachs
Ciberpiratas divulgan datos confidenciales de ejecutivos de Goldman Sachs
Still 'God's work'? Blankfein defends Goldman
25 Sep 2013
It wasn't quite "God's work." But it was close.
Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein came out swinging in defense of global capitalism as well as bonuses paid by the firm after it received government aid in the wake of the financial crisis.
At panel at the Clinton Global Initiative meeting Wednesday afternoon, moderator Fareed Zakaria had asked Blankfein to respond to the two-year anniversary of the Occupy Wall Street protest movement.
At first Blankfein took a light-hearted tact, saying that if he had realized it was such an important anniversary he would have sent flowers. But a few moments later the Goldman chief executive and chairman turned more serious.
(Read more: Bank boom continues: Goldman Sachs profit doubles)
"I would say to Occupy Wall Street, that business has helped lift more people out of poverty than philanthropy," Blankfein said in a Wednesday afternoon panel at the Clinton Global Initiative meeting.
Philanthropy can "fill the gaps" where profit motives don't suffice to improve the lives of the poor. But it's role is "supplementary." The "bulk of it"—raising people out of poverty—is done by business, he said.
"We should educate the public more about how business and its core activities have lifted people out of poverty," Blankfein said.
Blankfein was widely criticized for an off-hand, half-joking remark he made years ago describing the role of an investment bank as doing "God's work."
Blankfein defended the payment of bonuses to employees at Goldman Sachs by arguing that it was necessary to "keep the firm together."
(Read more: Goldman CEO on risk: Worst 'absolutely will happen'
"If we hadn't paid our people we wouldn't have had a stable population at the firm," he said. "I work at the company. I don't own it. I'm not entitled to blow it up" by not paying bonuses.
In another remark likely to generate controversy, Blankfein praised the U.S. for having "accepted a higher unemployment rate" over the past few years, even as it bailed out the banks. Labor market flexibility—reflected in the ability of U.S. companies to fire workers—is one of the reasons the U.S. is doing so well despite many headwinds in the economy, he said.
"The United States is in a position where the banks are recapitalized and companies are more efficient, not because they kept people on but because they let them go. It was a social decision we made," Blankfein said.
The political standoff over the federal budget is already hurting the U.S economy and markets, according to Blankfein.
"Saying we'll blow up the credit rating is not responsible," he said.
According to Blankfein, the U.S. is very unlikely to default on its debt because of a debt ceiling stalemate. But an actual default isn't necessary for economic harm to be inflicted.
(Read more: Defunding Obamacare is 'not in the cards': Corker)
"It's not an on/off switch. We already making people nervous," he said. "It's already bad."
Blankfein said that although his focus is on Republicans "right now," some blame must be placed on the Obama administration for its early behavior.
He argued that the Obama administration acted as if it were in a parliamentary system early in its first term, when it controlled both the House and Senate. It didn't reach out to Republicans enough when passing health care reform, he argued. That set the tone for the GOP's defiant stance..
If the health care reform known as Obamacare had been passed with "more Republican support and concessions to earn it," the tone in Washington would be different now, he said.
Blankfein downplayed the importance of the possibility of the Federal Reserve tapering its bond buying program, saying that it was just one step among many the U.S. is undertaking to normalize its economic situation.
"The tapering of (quantitative easing) is not the first step toward normalization," Blankfein said. He cited rising rates in long-term Treasury bonds and deficit reduction as steps that had already been taken.
(Read more: The Fed's 'hiddenagenda' behind money-printing)
But he wasn't totally at ease with the beginning of the end of QE.
"It's among the long parade of things over which I'm anxious," he said.
The topic of the panel was supposed to be emerging markets. Zakaria admitted at the very start that he reserved the right to take liberties with panel topics—and this was no exception.
Eventually, however, the panel—which also included Denis O'Brien, the chairman of Digicel, and Jim Rogers, chairman of Duke Energy—managed to get around to emerging markets.
Blankfein said that emerging markets "will grow faster than the developing world in this century but not evenly." There will be "mistakes and things will have to be written off."
"If the 20th century was the American century, well, it was ours but we didn't own every year," Blankfein said. "There will be fits and starts."
China, Blankfein argued, had "just come off a period where it was growth at all costs." Now it was beginning to concern itself with sustainability, environmental impact, and quality of life. Growth would likely be slower because of these new concerns.
"As soon as you get a little rich, things like breathing become important," he said.
The shale energy revolution "matters hugely" Blankfein said.
"We're not in a position where we can be energy sufficient," he said.
Blankfein argued that this would have geopolitical ramifications. The U.S. has been policing the world's waterways "so oil can go to China." That might shift now that the U.S. isn't as dependent on foreign energy sources.
"Different decisions would have been made over the last 40 years (if it weren't for foreign energy dependence). So what does that tell you about the next 40 years?" he said.
Blankfein said that he thought many businesses and individuals in the U.S. have not yet come to grips with the changes possible due to energy sufficiency. Cheaper energy in the U.S. is a reason to expect more growth, he argued.
"We should do a better job of reveling in our blessings and not just our burdens," he said.