Tornado en la planta nuclear
Fortunately, the tornado did not directly hit the two nuclear reactors. The Surry Power Station is close to 50 miles southeast of Richmond.
The Richmond-Times Dispatch reported that 1 of the units had already been scheduled to go offline Saturday to refuel. The second reactor is scheduled to come back online when the switchyard repairs are completed.
This incident highlights, again, the precariousness of nuclear power in the face of natural disasters. Had the tornado hit one or both of the nuclear reactors, the damage could have been immense.
Planta Nuclear Browns Ferry en Alabama cierra por seguidilla de tornados
Tornados dañaron la red de distribución de electricidad de alta tensión en tres estados del sureste de EE.UU. y causaron el cierre automático de tres reactores de la Planta Nuclear Browns Ferry.
RTVE.es 28.04.2011 – 15:49h -Al menos 185 personas han muerto en las últimas 24 horas en el sur de Estados Unidos por la sucesión de tornados y tormentas, según el último balance oficial. Solo en el estado de Alabama, hay 131 muertos, lo que ha llevado al presidente, Barak Obama, a declarar el estado de emergencia.
Los tornados, unos diez según las primeras estimaciones, azotaron la tarde del 27 de abril Alabama y Georgia dejando vastas áreas de destrucción y decenas de víctimas fatales, aun por contabilizar.
Los fenómenos meteorológicos dañaron la red de distribución de electricidad de alta tensión en tres estados del sureste del país y causaron el cierre automático de tres reactores de la Planta Nuclear Browns Ferry,.
La empresa Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA), que opera la instalación, dijo que la parálisis de la planta ocurrió en condiciones seguras.
Añadió que se utiliza una combinación de líneas de transmisión de otras fuentes y de los generadores diesel propios para proporcionar energía a la planta.
La TVA suministra electricidad al sureste del país, incluyendo los estados de Alabama, Georgia y Tennessee.
Los tornados, unos diez según las primeras estimaciones, azotaron esta tarde Alabama y Georgia dejando vastas áreas de destrucción y decenas de víctimas fatales, aun por contabilizar.
La compañía informó que los tornados y los fuertes vientos derribaron 11 de sus mayores líneas de transmisión en las entidades afectadas.
Al menos 300 mil personas quedaron sin electricidad al caer la noche de este miércoles en Alabama, Georgia, y las zonas del norte y este de Tennessee.
La TVA precisó en un comunicado que ‘a las 16:36 (hora central) Browns Ferry declaró un ‘acontecimiento excepcional’, debido a la suspensión automática de la planta’.
‘Un evento inusual es el nivel más bajo de emergencia en una planta nuclear de Estados Unidos’, dijo la compañía.
Hasta las 19:30 horas del miércoles (00:30 horas GMT del jueves) los principales daños se registraban en la comunidad de Tuscaloosa, donde dos tornados, uno de ellos de 1.5 kilómetros de ancho, arrasaron el centro del poblado de 15 mil habitantes ubicado al suroeste de Birmingham.
Reporteros de varias estaciones de televisión de Birmingham, que llegaron a Tuscaloosa, dieron cuenta de daños mayores en la infraestructura de esa ciudad con múltiples establecimientos comerciales y casas destruidas o dañadas.
La cadena de televisión CN informó que cuando menos 31 personas habían muerto en Alabama y el oeste de Georgia a causa de los tornados.
CN emitió la cifra de víctimas en forma preliminar al advertir que las autoridades aún evalúan los daños, mientras rescatan sobrevivientes y localizan cadáveres.
Otras estaciones de televisión en Alabama contabilizaban 25 fallecimientos, aunque ninguna autoridad emitía aún alguna cifra oficial.
.
Series of storms that hit states from Oklahoma to North Carolina left at least 45 people dead and caused widespread damage
guardian.co.uk, Monday 18 April 2011 18.19 BST
A US nuclear power company has disclosed that one of the tornadoes that hit the US at the weekend, killing at least 45 people and causing widespread damage, forced the shutdown of two of its reactors.
The series of tornadoes that began in Oklahoma late last week barrelled across the country, with North Carolina, where 22 people died, the worst-hit state.
The US nuclear safety regulator said on Mondayit was monitoring the Surry nuclear power plant in Virginia. Dominion Virginia Power said the two reactors shut down automatically when a tornado cut off power to the plant. A backup diesel generator kicked in to cool the fuel. The regulator said no radiation was released and staff were working to restore electricity to the plant.
The tornadoes were among the worst in the US in the past two decades. Last year, 10 people died in a tornado in Mississippi, while 57 were killed in North and South Carolina in 1984 and 330 across the south in 1974.
Two of the survivors of this year’s storms, Audrey McKoy and her husband Milton, who live near Raleigh, North Carolina, told the Associated Press they had seen the tornado bearing down on them over the tops of pine trees. At a nearby farm, winds were lifting pigs and other animals into the sky. “It looked just like The Wizard of Oz,” McKoy said.
They took shelter in their laundry room. After they emerged, disorientated, they realised that the tornado had turned their mobile home around.
The national weather centre in Raleigh issued detailed descriptions of the tornadoes and their paths of destruction.
One of them, with winds greater than 100mph, destroyed trees, ripped off roofs and wrecked power lines. It hit Shaw University in Raleigh and then strengthened to 110mph. “Snapped trees crashed on to and through numerous homes all along the path. It is in this area where three fatalities were reported when two mobile homes were thrown 30 to 50ft [nine to 15 metres]. Nearly all of the mobile homes in the park sustained some type of damage,” the weather report said.
Thousands of workers from the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the national disaster organisation, are being deployed in North Carolina to assess the damage.
The North Carolina governor, Bev Perdue, interviewed on the NBC Today programme, said the storms had ripped through homes as if they were made of paper. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/apr/18/us-tornadoes-shutdown-nuclear-reactors
-
Tornados causan decenas de muertes y cierre de planta nuclear en …28 Abr 2011 … Hogares destruídos por los tornados en Tuscaloosa, Alabama. AP … el cierre automático de tres reactores de la Planta Nuclear Browns Ferry …www.informador.com.mx/…/tornados-causan-decenas-de-muertes-y-cierre-de-planta-nuclear-en-eu.htm
-
Tornados causan decenas de muertes y cierre de planta nuclear …27 Abr 2011 … Nuevo video: Catástrofes por tornados, tormentas e inundaciones … de tres reactores de la Planta Nuclear Browns Ferry, en Alabama. …
www.excelsior.com.mx/index.php?m=nota&id_nota=732630
US nuclear plant shuts safely as tornado hits
Posted on by CNE Chile
18 April 2011 – Both units at Dominion Virginia Power’s Surry nuclear plant in Virginia shut down automatically as designed when an apparent tornado touched down at the plant’s switchyard, cutting off external electricity supplies to the station. Backup diesel generators started up immediately to provide the necessary power to keep the two pressurised water reactors in a safe and stable condition. The tornado did not strike the nuclear units themselves, although their steel-reinforced concrete containment buildings are designed to withstand such natural events. Off-site power sources were subsequently restored to each unit.
Fuente: world-nuclear-news
SURRY NUKE / Virginia
rootswire.org/content/surry-nuke-facility-tak…
US tornadoes force shutdown of two nuclear reactors in Virginia
18-4-2011 – Series of storms that hit states from Oklahoma to North Carolina left at least 45 people dead and caused widespread damage
A US nuclear power company has disclosed that one of the tornadoes that hit the US at the weekend, killing at least 45 people and causing widespread damage, forced the shutdown of two of its reactors.
The series of tornadoes that began in Oklahoma late last week barrelled across the country, with North Carolina, where 22 people died, the worst-hit state.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/apr/18/us-tornadoes-shutdown-nuclear-reactors?intcmp=239
The US nuclear safety regulator said on Monday it was monitoring the Surry nuclear power plant in Virginia. Dominion Virginia Power said the two reactors shut down automatically when a tornado cut off power to the plant. A backup diesel generator kicked in to cool the fuel. The regulator said no radiation was released and staff were working to restore electricity to the plant.
The tornadoes were among the worst in the US in the past two decades. Last year, 10 people died in a tornado in Mississippi, while 57 were killed in North and South Carolina in 1984 and 330 across the south in 1974.
Two of the survivors of this year’s storms, Audrey McKoy and her husband Milton, who live near Raleigh, North Carolina, told the Associated Press they had seen the tornado bearing down on them over the tops of pine trees. At a nearby farm, winds were lifting pigs and other animals into the sky. “It looked just like The Wizard of Oz,” McKoy said.
They took shelter in their laundry room. After they emerged, disorientated, they realised that the tornado had turned their mobile home around.
The national weather centre in Raleigh issued detailed descriptions of the tornadoes and their paths of destruction.
One of them, with winds greater than 100mph, destroyed trees, ripped off roofs and wrecked power lines. It hit Shaw University in Raleigh and then strengthened to 110mph. “Snapped trees crashed on to and through numerous homes all along the path. It is in this area where three fatalities were reported when two mobile homes were thrown 30 to 50ft [nine to 15 metres]. Nearly all of the mobile homes in the park sustained some type of damage,” the weather report said.
Thousands of workers from the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the national disaster organisation, are being deployed in North Carolina to assess the damage.
The North Carolina governor, Bev Perdue, interviewed on the NBC Today programme, said the storms had ripped through homes as if they were made of paper.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/apr/18/us-tornadoes-shutdown-nuclear-reactors?intcmp=239
Tornadoes rip through southern US states – in pictures
guardian.co.uk, Monday 18 April 2011 – A savage storm system has left dozens dead across the southern United States and hundreds of thousands without power, with North Carolina alone hit by 62 tornadoes
SM-1 nuclear power plant at Fort Belvoir
Nuclear reactors provide about 1/3 of the electricity generated in Virginia. Virginia has commercial nuclear power plants at two locations, with two reactors each in Louisa County (North Anna 1 and North Anna 2) and Surry County (Surry 1 and Surry 2). The plants are most efficient when running at a steady rate, so they are used for baseload rather than peaking power.
- Baseload plants run 24 hours per day and supply the electricity needed even when demand is at its lowest level. Peaking plants are turned on and off during the day, and supply extra energy needed in the morning (when people wake up, get ready for work/school, and turn on lights/hairdryers etc.) or in the evening (when people come home and cook dinner, do laundry, etc.).
One-third of the electricity distributed by Dominion Resources is produced by these two plants, and it has plans to add a new 1,600 megawatt reactor at the North Anna site. The third reactor, if built, would use a pressurized water reactor designed by Mitsubishi Heavy Industries.
The company recognizes the risks of using nuclear fuel, and the economics of the private utility are affected by its costs to manage those risks – including the day in the future when the nuclear power plants must be closed permanently (decommissioned). In its 2005 Annual Report, Dominion reported that it had set aside $2.6 billion to satisfy the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s minimum financial assurance amounts for the future decommissioning of its nuclear facilities, but this may not equal the total that actually could be required.1
- There are inherent risks in the operation of nuclear facilities. Dominion operates nuclear facilities that are subject to inherent risks. These include the threat of terrorist attack and ability to dispose of spent nuclear fuel, the disposal of which is subject to complex federal and state regulatory constraints. These risks also include the cost of and Dominion�s ability to maintain adequate reserves for decommissioning, costs of plant maintenance and exposure to potential liabilities arising out of the operation of these facilities. Dominion maintains decommissioning trusts and external insurance coverage to manage the financial exposure to these risks. However, it is possible that costs arising from claims could exceed the amount of any insurance coverage.
Fear of nuclear power after the Three Mile Island incident in 1979 limited the development of additional nuclear power plants in Virginia as a source for electricity. To present the case that nuclear power is safe, Dominion has visitor centers at each plant and even an online tour of a nuclear power plant.
Disaster plans have been developed for the reactors in Virginia (and for an incident at Calvert Cliffs in nearby Maryland) to evacuate people within 10 miles of North Anna Power Station (with a protected action zone for Caroline, Hanover, Louisa, Orange, and Spotsylvania counties) and Surry Power Station (with a protected action zone for Isle of Wight, James City, Surry, York counties and the cities of Newport News and Williamsburg). There are also plans to protect dairy products and crops within 50 miles.
The two nuclear reactors at the University of Virginia reactor in Charlottesville – the 100-watt “Cooperatively Assembled Virginia Low-Intensity Educational Reactor” (CAVALIER) and 2-megawatt University of Virginia Reactor (UVAR) were decommissioned in 1988 and 1998.
The Army Nuclear Power Program, based at Fort Belvoir, built and tested two small nuclear power plants at that site. It created the first nuclear power plant to generate electricity in Virginia, the 10-megawatt SM-1. The Army claims the SM-1 “was the first nuclear power reactor to provide electricity to a commercial power grid in the U.S.,”2 before it was deactivated in 1973. That power plant was an early model of what the Army expected to be many small nuclear power plants built for deployment to locations without electricity or conventional petroleum-based fuels, places that were not “on the grid” in an industrialized location.3
- In November 1963, an Army study submitted to the Department of Defense (DOD) proposed employing a military compact reactor (MCR) as the power source for a nuclear-powered energy depot, which was being considered as a means of producing synthetic fuels in a combat zone for use in military vehicles. MCR studies, which had begun in 1955, grew out of the Transportation Corps’ interest in using nuclear energy to power heavy, overland cargo haulers in remote areas. These studies investigated various reactor and vehicle concepts, including a small liquid-metal-cooled reactor, but ultimately the concept proved impractical.
- The energy depot, however, was an attempt to solve the logistics problem of supplying fuel to military vehicles on the battlefield. While nuclear power could not supply energy directly to individual vehicles, the MCR could provide power to manufacture, under field conditions, a synthetic fuel as a substitute for conventional carbon-based fuels.
The Army also tested its last nuclear power plant in Virginia. The MH-1A reactor capable of producing as much as 45 megawatts was installed in a World War Two Liberty ship, renamed the USS Sturgis after the recently-deceased Chief of the US Army Corps of Engineers. The ship’s propulsion system was removed, in order to make space for the rector. After a successful test of the reactor at Gunston Cove on the Potomac River, the floating power plant was towed to the Panama Canal, where it operated as a 10-megawatt power barge during the Vietnam War. The nuclear-generated electricity replaced output from a hydropower plant, allowing more water from Gatun Lake to be used for ship transits.4
Both the SM-1 and MH-1A reactors have now been deactivated. The Army may wait as long as 50 years for radiation to decrease before complete decommissioning of the reactors.5 The USS Sturgis has been placed in the Reserve Fleet in the James River before it is recycled.6
USS Sturgis with MH-1A nuclear power plant, operating in the Panama Canal Zone
Source: Panama Historical Society Facebook pageThe Navy has continued its nuclear power program in Virginia, installing and refueling nuclear reactors in aircraft carriers and submarines at Newport News.
(NOTE: In many Virginia communities, hospitals and dentist offices have radioactive isotopes in various medical equipment, but these are generating radiation for X-rays and other medical purposes rather than power.)
Links
- American Nuclear Society – Virginia Section
- Cavalier Daily – What’s UVAR? Decommission process continues despite reactor’s original research opportunities
- Dominion Resources
- North Anna Power Station Surry Power Station Nuclear Emergency Preparedness Hubbert Peak of Oil Production
- Nuclear Energy and the Fossil Fuels (1956 prediction that nuclear energy would replace petroleum)
- North Anna Power Station Surry Power Station Nuclear Emergency Preparedness Hubbert Peak of Oil Production
- Northrop Grumman Newport News (“We are the nation’s sole designer, builder and refueler of nuclear-powered aircraft carriers and one of only two companies capable of designing and building nuclear-powered submarines.”)
- Nuclear Energy Institute – Nuclear Power in Virginia
- Omniknow – Army Nuclear Power Program
- University of Virginia reactors
- Decommissioning Results and Lessons Learned at the University of Virginia Reactor Facility
- Nuclear Regulatory Commission – University of Virginia
- UVAR home page (decommissioned)
- CH2MHill – Research Reactor Decommissioning
- The Cerenkov Blue – when UVa Went Nuclear (University of Virginia magazine)
- US Army Corps of Engineers
- US Department of Energy – Energy Information Administration
- US Nuclear Regulatory Commission
- Early Site Permits Licensing Review – Dominion Nuclear North Anna, LLC Application for the North Anna ESP Site
- Medical, Industrial, and Academic Uses of Nuclear Materials
- North Anna and Surry, Power Stations – License Renewal Application
- NRC Renews Licenses for North Anna Power Station, Units 1 and 2, and Surry Power Station, Units 1 and 2,for an Additional 20 Years
- Safety Evaluation Report Related to the License Renewal of North Anna Power Station, Units 1 and 2, and Surry Power Station Station, Units 1 and 2 (NUREG-1766)
- Virginia
- Virginia Business – The nuclear option Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ)
- Virginia Department of Health – Radiological Health Program
- Virtual Nuclear Tourist
References
1. Dominion Resources, 2004 Annual Report, p.52 and p.87, www.dom.com/investors/annual2004/domannual.pdf (last checked February 24, 2006)
2. US Army Logistics Management College, “Corps has responsibility for three old atomic reactors,” www.hq.usace.army.mil/cepa/pubs/apr01/story8.htm (last checked February 24, 2006)
3. US Army Logistics Management College, “Nuclear Power: An Option for the Army’s Future,” www.almc.army.mil/alog/issues/SepOct01/MS684.htm (last checked February 24, 2006)
4. US Army Corps of Engineers, The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: A History, Publication Number EP 870-1-68, p. 155, http://140.194.76.129/publications/eng-pamphlets/ep870-1-68/c-3.pdf (last checked May 22, 2010)
5. Burns, Brenda, M., “Quo Vadis: Where Goes the Army Reactor Program?” in NBC Report, United States Army Nuclear and Chemical Agency, Fall-Winter 2004, pp.69-70, https://www.cbrniac.apgea.army.mil/…/NBC_Report_Fall_Winter04.pdf (last checked May 22, 2010)
6. Honerlah, Hans B. and Hearty, Brian P., “Characterization Of The Nuclear Barge Sturgis” from Proceedings of the Waste Management 2002 Conference, February 24-28, 2002, http://www.wmsym.org/archives/2002/Proceedings/44/168.pdf (last checked May 22, 2010)
power lines headed south from Surry nuclear power plant—————————————————————————————
Tornadoes rip through southern US states – in pictures
guardian.co.uk, Monday 18 April 2011 – A savage storm system has left dozens dead across the southern United States and hundreds of thousands without power, with North Carolina alone hit by 62 tornadoes
SM-1 nuclear power plant at Fort Belvoir
Nuclear reactors provide about 1/3 of the electricity generated in Virginia. Virginia has commercial nuclear power plants at two locations, with two reactors each in Louisa County (North Anna 1 and North Anna 2) and Surry County (Surry 1 and Surry 2). The plants are most efficient when running at a steady rate, so they are used for baseload rather than peaking power.
- Baseload plants run 24 hours per day and supply the electricity needed even when demand is at its lowest level. Peaking plants are turned on and off during the day, and supply extra energy needed in the morning (when people wake up, get ready for work/school, and turn on lights/hairdryers etc.) or in the evening (when people come home and cook dinner, do laundry, etc.).
One-third of the electricity distributed by Dominion Resources is produced by these two plants, and it has plans to add a new 1,600 megawatt reactor at the North Anna site. The third reactor, if built, would use a pressurized water reactor designed by Mitsubishi Heavy Industries.
The company recognizes the risks of using nuclear fuel, and the economics of the private utility are affected by its costs to manage those risks – including the day in the future when the nuclear power plants must be closed permanently (decommissioned). In its 2005 Annual Report, Dominion reported that it had set aside $2.6 billion to satisfy the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s minimum financial assurance amounts for the future decommissioning of its nuclear facilities, but this may not equal the total that actually could be required.1
- There are inherent risks in the operation of nuclear facilities. Dominion operates nuclear facilities that are subject to inherent risks. These include the threat of terrorist attack and ability to dispose of spent nuclear fuel, the disposal of which is subject to complex federal and state regulatory constraints. These risks also include the cost of and Dominion�s ability to maintain adequate reserves for decommissioning, costs of plant maintenance and exposure to potential liabilities arising out of the operation of these facilities. Dominion maintains decommissioning trusts and external insurance coverage to manage the financial exposure to these risks. However, it is possible that costs arising from claims could exceed the amount of any insurance coverage.
Fear of nuclear power after the Three Mile Island incident in 1979 limited the development of additional nuclear power plants in Virginia as a source for electricity. To present the case that nuclear power is safe, Dominion has visitor centers at each plant and even an online tour of a nuclear power plant.
Disaster plans have been developed for the reactors in Virginia (and for an incident at Calvert Cliffs in nearby Maryland) to evacuate people within 10 miles of North Anna Power Station (with a protected action zone for Caroline, Hanover, Louisa, Orange, and Spotsylvania counties) and Surry Power Station (with a protected action zone for Isle of Wight, James City, Surry, York counties and the cities of Newport News and Williamsburg). There are also plans to protect dairy products and crops within 50 miles.
The two nuclear reactors at the University of Virginia reactor in Charlottesville – the 100-watt “Cooperatively Assembled Virginia Low-Intensity Educational Reactor” (CAVALIER) and 2-megawatt University of Virginia Reactor (UVAR) were decommissioned in 1988 and 1998.
The Army Nuclear Power Program, based at Fort Belvoir, built and tested two small nuclear power plants at that site. It created the first nuclear power plant to generate electricity in Virginia, the 10-megawatt SM-1. The Army claims the SM-1 “was the first nuclear power reactor to provide electricity to a commercial power grid in the U.S.,”2 before it was deactivated in 1973. That power plant was an early model of what the Army expected to be many small nuclear power plants built for deployment to locations without electricity or conventional petroleum-based fuels, places that were not “on the grid” in an industrialized location.3
- In November 1963, an Army study submitted to the Department of Defense (DOD) proposed employing a military compact reactor (MCR) as the power source for a nuclear-powered energy depot, which was being considered as a means of producing synthetic fuels in a combat zone for use in military vehicles. MCR studies, which had begun in 1955, grew out of the Transportation Corps’ interest in using nuclear energy to power heavy, overland cargo haulers in remote areas. These studies investigated various reactor and vehicle concepts, including a small liquid-metal-cooled reactor, but ultimately the concept proved impractical.
- The energy depot, however, was an attempt to solve the logistics problem of supplying fuel to military vehicles on the battlefield. While nuclear power could not supply energy directly to individual vehicles, the MCR could provide power to manufacture, under field conditions, a synthetic fuel as a substitute for conventional carbon-based fuels.
The Army also tested its last nuclear power plant in Virginia. The MH-1A reactor capable of producing as much as 45 megawatts was installed in a World War Two Liberty ship, renamed the USS Sturgis after the recently-deceased Chief of the US Army Corps of Engineers. The ship’s propulsion system was removed, in order to make space for the rector. After a successful test of the reactor at Gunston Cove on the Potomac River, the floating power plant was towed to the Panama Canal, where it operated as a 10-megawatt power barge during the Vietnam War. The nuclear-generated electricity replaced output from a hydropower plant, allowing more water from Gatun Lake to be used for ship transits.4
Both the SM-1 and MH-1A reactors have now been deactivated. The Army may wait as long as 50 years for radiation to decrease before complete decommissioning of the reactors.5 The USS Sturgis has been placed in the Reserve Fleet in the James River before it is recycled.6
USS Sturgis with MH-1A nuclear power plant, operating in the Panama Canal Zone
Source: Panama Historical Society Facebook pageThe Navy has continued its nuclear power program in Virginia, installing and refueling nuclear reactors in aircraft carriers and submarines at Newport News.
(NOTE: In many Virginia communities, hospitals and dentist offices have radioactive isotopes in various medical equipment, but these are generating radiation for X-rays and other medical purposes rather than power.)
Links
- American Nuclear Society – Virginia Section
- Cavalier Daily – What’s UVAR? Decommission process continues despite reactor’s original research opportunities
- Dominion Resources
- North Anna Power Station Surry Power Station Nuclear Emergency Preparedness Hubbert Peak of Oil Production
- Nuclear Energy and the Fossil Fuels (1956 prediction that nuclear energy would replace petroleum)
- North Anna Power Station Surry Power Station Nuclear Emergency Preparedness Hubbert Peak of Oil Production
- Northrop Grumman Newport News (“We are the nation’s sole designer, builder and refueler of nuclear-powered aircraft carriers and one of only two companies capable of designing and building nuclear-powered submarines.”)
- Nuclear Energy Institute – Nuclear Power in Virginia
- Omniknow – Army Nuclear Power Program
- University of Virginia reactors
- Decommissioning Results and Lessons Learned at the University of Virginia Reactor Facility
- Nuclear Regulatory Commission – University of Virginia
- UVAR home page (decommissioned)
- CH2MHill – Research Reactor Decommissioning
- The Cerenkov Blue – when UVa Went Nuclear (University of Virginia magazine)
- US Army Corps of Engineers
- US Department of Energy – Energy Information Administration
- US Nuclear Regulatory Commission
- Early Site Permits Licensing Review – Dominion Nuclear North Anna, LLC Application for the North Anna ESP Site
- Medical, Industrial, and Academic Uses of Nuclear Materials
- North Anna and Surry, Power Stations – License Renewal Application
- ews/2003/03-033.html">NRC Renews Licenses for North Anna Power Station, Units 1 and 2, and Surry Power Station, Units 1 and 2,for an Additional 20 Years
- Safety Evaluation Report Related to the License Renewal of North Anna Power Station, Units 1 and 2, and Surry Power Station Station, Units 1 and 2 (NUREG-1766)
- Virginia
- Virginia Business – The nuclear option Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ)
- Virginia Department of Health – Radiological Health Program
- Virtual Nuclear Tourist
References
1. Dominion Resources, 2004 Annual Report, p.52 and p.87, www.dom.com/investors/annual2004/domannual.pdf (last checked February 24, 2006)
2. US Army Logistics Management College, “Corps has responsibility for three old atomic reactors,” www.hq.usace.army.mil/cepa/pubs/apr01/story8.htm (last checked February 24, 2006)
3. US Army Logistics Management College, “Nuclear Power: An Option for the Army’s Future,” www.almc.army.mil/alog/issues/SepOct01/MS684.htm (last checked February 24, 2006)
4. US Army Corps of Engineers, The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: A History, Publication Number EP 870-1-68, p. 155, http://140.194.76.129/publications/eng-pamphlets/ep870-1-68/c-3.pdf (last checked May 22, 2010)
5. Burns, Brenda, M., “Quo Vadis: Where Goes the Army Reactor Program?” in NBC Report, United States Army Nuclear and Chemical Agency, Fall-Winter 2004, pp.69-70, https://www.cbrniac.apgea.army.mil/…/NBC_Report_Fall_Winter04.pdf (last checked May 22, 2010)
6. Honerlah, Hans B. and Hearty, Brian P., “Characterization Of The Nuclear Barge Sturgis” from Proceedings of the Waste Management 2002 Conference, February 24-28, 2002, http://www.wmsym.org/archives/2002/Proceedings/44/168.pdf (last checked May 22, 2010)
power lines headed south from Surry nuclear power plant—————————————————————————————
![[GLOBO_CARTAS_PAIS_GENEROSO_CROP_3_640_26ABRIL08.jpg]](http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_tD38PUwSshg/SBSwqMFuQrI/AAAAAAAAANA/rZ_ctuzuqjE/s1600/GLOBO_CARTAS_PAIS_GENEROSO_CROP_3_640_26ABRIL08.jpg)
“En la selva” se propone estudiar rigurosamente al Che, indagando en su mundo cultural, político e ideológico y en los libros y autores que él leyó y estudió. Intenta rescatar al Che del museo, el monumento y el póster inofensivo. Ni momia embalsamada ni muerto sagrado, el Che es un revolucionario de nuestro tiempo presente. Utilizar sus reflexiones es impresindeble para el “socialismo del siglo XXI”. 
